Does the word "LEGEND" get past round too freely??
Posted: Jun 20th, '12, 15:39
Heres one for you,
Does the word "legend" get past around to freely in pro wrestling today!!! For me as a wrestling fan i feel it does. I feel theres a difference between being a very good wrestler and a wrestling legend!!! For example i would class Hulk Hogan a "legend". We all know he is the biggest name in pro wrestling and him along with Vince McMahon revolutionised pro wrestling in the 80s/90s.
UNDERTAKER. Worked for WWE for 22 years!! Transformed himself so many times (Even tho i didnt like American badass that much)
STING/RIC FLAIR - Pretty much both of the were MR WCW.
BRET HART/SHAWN MICHAELS - Pretty much carried WWE with Undertaker after Hogan left.
AUSTIN/THE ROCK - Pretty much led Attitude era with Taker
You get the point. Anyway i feel that sometimes people get branded legends when infact they arent. For example (ill probs get comments bout this but, a wrestler might die and all of a sudden they are a "Legend")
Like Ric Flair won what 16 World titles?? In WWE now, Titles get passed around like a bong at a party!!
Batista 6 time world champ - So Batista who cant wrestle for **** has won more WWE world titles then Bret Hart??
Cena 12 time world champ?? Wins word title cause 12 year olds like him and all of a sudden WWE seems to have forgotten its older viewers who watched through the 80s, 90s and 00s
So ive got my rant out the way
who do u consider a legend?? but more importantly who do you think gets called a legend but really arent??
Does the word "legend" get past around to freely in pro wrestling today!!! For me as a wrestling fan i feel it does. I feel theres a difference between being a very good wrestler and a wrestling legend!!! For example i would class Hulk Hogan a "legend". We all know he is the biggest name in pro wrestling and him along with Vince McMahon revolutionised pro wrestling in the 80s/90s.
UNDERTAKER. Worked for WWE for 22 years!! Transformed himself so many times (Even tho i didnt like American badass that much)
STING/RIC FLAIR - Pretty much both of the were MR WCW.
BRET HART/SHAWN MICHAELS - Pretty much carried WWE with Undertaker after Hogan left.
AUSTIN/THE ROCK - Pretty much led Attitude era with Taker
You get the point. Anyway i feel that sometimes people get branded legends when infact they arent. For example (ill probs get comments bout this but, a wrestler might die and all of a sudden they are a "Legend")
Like Ric Flair won what 16 World titles?? In WWE now, Titles get passed around like a bong at a party!!
Batista 6 time world champ - So Batista who cant wrestle for **** has won more WWE world titles then Bret Hart??
Cena 12 time world champ?? Wins word title cause 12 year olds like him and all of a sudden WWE seems to have forgotten its older viewers who watched through the 80s, 90s and 00s
So ive got my rant out the way
who do u consider a legend?? but more importantly who do you think gets called a legend but really arent??