Scott Hall Talks Triple H vs Sting at WM31

Everything that is happening in the wrestling world.
Post Reply
User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Scott Hall Talks Triple H vs Sting at WM31

Post by cero2k » Jan 15th, '16, 09:39

Source: si.com

JBL formally announced on Monday that Sting will be inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame’s class of 2016. The “Nature Boy” Ric Flair is the safe choice to induct the Stinger, and most of the career highlights will focus on Sting’s greatness in WCW. Scott Hall was asked about Sting’s tenure with the WWE, and he expressed disappointment that Sting never found a comfort zone.
“I was there and obviously involved in his match at WrestleMania last year,” said Hall. “We’re rehearsing the match in Cali last year at Levi Stadium, and it’s the Kliq and the New Age Outlaws out there, and we all know each other. And then there’s Sting, who doesn’t know anybody. He’s an outsider. I just think he never felt comfortable there. Being hurt was answered prayer for him–just let it end.
“You need to remember that Vince is never going to go with something he didn’t create. But we didn’t get anything done at the rehearsal the night before, so WrestleMania day, there were tents in the parking lot set up with rings for rehearsal. So we’re all in there again, and I’m next to Hulk on the ring apron and Triple H is going over the match and then he goes, ‘OK, he’ll break the sledgehammer, then I’ll hit him with the sledgehammer, and cover him, 1-2-3.’ I looked at Hulk, and Hulk looked at me, and I was thinking, ‘Sting, what kind of lawyer do you have, bro? You’re coming in the door doing a job? You weren’t even guaranteed to go over?’ That’s Vince just reminding you who won, even if he’s going to make money the other way.”
Image

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: Scott Hall Talks Triple H vs Sting at WM31

Post by Big Red Machine » Jan 15th, '16, 10:24

cero2k wrote:Source: si.com


“You need to remember that Vince is never going to go with something he didn’t create. But we didn’t get anything done at the rehearsal the night before, so WrestleMania day, there were tents in the parking lot set up with rings for rehearsal. So we’re all in there again, and I’m next to Hulk on the ring apron and Triple H is going over the match and then he goes, ‘OK, he’ll break the sledgehammer, then I’ll hit him with the sledgehammer, and cover him, 1-2-3.’ I looked at Hulk, and Hulk looked at me, and I was thinking, ‘Sting, what kind of lawyer do you have, bro? You’re coming in the door doing a job? You weren’t even guaranteed to go over?’ That’s Vince just reminding you who won, even if he’s going to make money the other way.”
Don't take this as me defending the decision to have Sting lose, but I think it's an interesting contrast in attitudes between Hogan and Hall, and Sting. They're concerned with getting themselves over/making sure they don't look weak, while Sting, as he showed both at Mania and throughout pretty much his entire run in TNA, was willing to do whatever the company asked, even if it meant losing or looking ridiculous.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Re: Scott Hall Talks Triple H vs Sting at WM31

Post by cero2k » Jan 15th, '16, 10:43

Big Red Machine wrote: Don't take this as me defending the decision to have Sting lose, but I think it's an interesting contrast in attitudes between Hogan and Hall, and Sting. They're concerned with getting themselves over/making sure they don't look weak, while Sting, as he showed both at Mania and throughout pretty much his entire run in TNA, was willing to do whatever the company asked, even if it meant losing or looking ridiculous.
i think there is a lot here on Sting coming to WWE when there was literally nothing left for him to do other than retire. I mean, there is a whole reason why Sting wouldn't come to WWE in the last 15 yrs
Image

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: Scott Hall Talks Triple H vs Sting at WM31

Post by Big Red Machine » Jan 15th, '16, 10:44

cero2k wrote:
Big Red Machine wrote: Don't take this as me defending the decision to have Sting lose, but I think it's an interesting contrast in attitudes between Hogan and Hall, and Sting. They're concerned with getting themselves over/making sure they don't look weak, while Sting, as he showed both at Mania and throughout pretty much his entire run in TNA, was willing to do whatever the company asked, even if it meant losing or looking ridiculous.
i think there is a lot here on Sting coming to WWE when there was literally nothing left for him to do other than retire. I mean, there is a whole reason why Sting wouldn't come to WWE in the last 15 yrs
Yeah. Meltzer certainly framed it like Sting thought this was would be his last match, so it made sense to him that he should lose it because that's what you do.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests