WOTW: Royal Rumble
-
yourcrapsweak
- Posts: 2001
- Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12
Re: WOTW: Royal Rumble
'97. It was good but there was such a lack of star power, they had to use a bunch of AAA guys who were not over at all and probably confused. Hell, Mil Mascaras eliminated himself.
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen
-Kevin Steen
-
Big Bad Booty Daddy
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Dec 21st, '10, 10:07
Re: WOTW: Royal Rumble
99 for me.
Generally because McMahon won it. Also the fact McMahon and Austin were last two yet speant most of the rumble out of the ring!!!
Generally because McMahon won it. Also the fact McMahon and Austin were last two yet speant most of the rumble out of the ring!!!
-
yourcrapsweak
- Posts: 2001
- Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12
Re: WOTW: Royal Rumble
Not only that, but the Rumble was an afterthought because of that storyline. Plus, there wasn't ANYONE in there who you were like "oh maybe they could win!" It was Austin all the way and there was no doubt in anybody's mind that someone like Ken Shamrock or Billy Gunn would win.Big Bad Booty Daddy wrote:99 for me.
Generally because McMahon won it. Also the fact McMahon and Austin were last two yet speant most of the rumble out of the ring!!!
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen
-Kevin Steen
Re: WOTW: Royal Rumble
'99 is one of my favourite rumbles. But then, that's the first wrestling I ever watched. I fucking loved it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest