RAW Discussion 1/16
Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
no; that's what they specified on Superstars. ANYBODY can be in the Rumble this year, even the challengers for the titles and the current champs themselves if they lose at the Rumble.Dead Man Walking wrote:Yes that happends every year but they only people that can't be in it are people in wwe title match or world title match or if you are the world or wwe championbadnewzxl wrote: even if you have match, you can still compete in the Rumble this year. They said something about it on Superstars

Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
Very true, wasn't Orton in the rumble last year after he lost the WWE title match?badnewzxl wrote:no; that's what they specified on Superstars. ANYBODY can be in the Rumble this year, even the challengers for the titles and the current champs themselves if they lose at the Rumble.

Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
not sure; I didn't think so. He might have come out to attack Punk, thoRabid619 wrote:Very true, wasn't Orton in the rumble last year after he lost the WWE title match?badnewzxl wrote:no; that's what they specified on Superstars. ANYBODY can be in the Rumble this year, even the challengers for the titles and the current champs themselves if they lose at the Rumble.

- Dead Man Walking
- Future Endeavored
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:48
Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
Kane come out now and kill swagger and then have a rematch to ryder wins the title backRabid619 wrote:Swagger wins and is the new US Champion.
Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
He did, he was the second to last to enter.badnewzxl wrote:not sure; I didn't think so. He might have come out to attack Punk, tho

- Dead Man Walking
- Future Endeavored
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:48
Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
Kelly kelly =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~ =p~
Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
A blogger?!! Why do we care if this guy is here? Wait isn't this guy a real a**hole or something.
Alicia Fox & Kelly vs. Bella Twins. Absolutely nothing pulls me in for this match.
Alicia Fox & Kelly vs. Bella Twins. Absolutely nothing pulls me in for this match.

- WrestlingJoker
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Jan 29th, '11, 19:03
Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
Yes.Rabid619 wrote:Wait isn't this guy a real a**hole or something.
- Dead Man Walking
- Future Endeavored
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:48
Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
This guy can't be that Popular because I have no fucking clue who he isRabid619 wrote:A blogger?!! Why do we care if this guy is here? Wait isn't this guy a real a**hole or something.
Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
This, that was thankfully short.badnewzxl wrote:just when you think the Divas segments couldn't get any worse..... :((

Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
he's literally a gossip queen/ tabloid like idiot who isn't credible enough to be a columnist so he had to blog until he got enough stupid chicks and rumor eating couch jockeys to acknowledge him so he can become famous. It's disgusting.Dead Man Walking wrote:This guy can't be that Popular because I have no f***ing clue who he isRabid619 wrote:A blogger?!! Why do we care if this guy is here? Wait isn't this guy a real a**hole or something.

Re: RAW Discussion 1/16
Oh crippity crap crap!!
4 men near the ring and Teddy Long comes out to make a tag match.
Holy Crap Batman!!! He's made a 4 man battle royal instead.
4 men near the ring and Teddy Long comes out to make a tag match.
Holy Crap Batman!!! He's made a 4 man battle royal instead.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests