Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
TRIPS WITH THE WIN

_________________________________________________________________________________
Outspoken, Bluntly Honest, Offensive and Politically Incorrect since '79
- Dead Man Walking
- Future Endeavored
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:48
Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
What you guys think about that match?
-
Robert Randall
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:32
Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
Laurenaitis texted Nash, he walked out texting and nash showed up
when I say I'm the ish, I'm not being cocky or conceited, I'm merely telling you what others told me "Rob, you're the ish"
- Dead Man Walking
- Future Endeavored
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:48
Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
I agree with you on that one.Phreak wrote:Dead Man Walking wrote:This match is awesome. Everyone is beating the s**t out of everyone else
MATCH OF THE NIGHT
Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
with this PPV...RAW and Smackdown Should be kick ass

_________________________________________________________________________________
Outspoken, Bluntly Honest, Offensive and Politically Incorrect since '79
- Dead Man Walking
- Future Endeavored
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:48
Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
After seeing HHH vs Cm Punk tonight i have to find it download it and keep it. Because that was one of the best matches and most interesting ones at that. I have seen in a wile.
Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
I enjoyed this PPV up until the Divas title match. Really, WWE, you give us the SAME match we saw last month? And Cena beating Del Rio made me yawn; I'm not even interested in seeing where/if the feud goes from here.
Lastly, WTF was going on in the main event? The only sot of the whole match I thought was memorable was Punk's flying elbow. There were al ot of ppl involved and their interference seemingly made no significant impact. There were four extra pl who wanted HHH to win and he STILL comes out the victor? Over CM Punk? I wanna know what else is gonna come of this but it's already kinda rubbing me the wrong way. I mean, you're not gonna save Punk (presently one of your three most popular superstars in the entire company) face in order to have HHH cleanly conserve his power? I would've liked it better if Punk hit the GTS after HHH laid Nash out with the sledgehammer, then put HHH on top of himself just to fuck with Laurenitis....
Lastly, WTF was going on in the main event? The only sot of the whole match I thought was memorable was Punk's flying elbow. There were al ot of ppl involved and their interference seemingly made no significant impact. There were four extra pl who wanted HHH to win and he STILL comes out the victor? Over CM Punk? I wanna know what else is gonna come of this but it's already kinda rubbing me the wrong way. I mean, you're not gonna save Punk (presently one of your three most popular superstars in the entire company) face in order to have HHH cleanly conserve his power? I would've liked it better if Punk hit the GTS after HHH laid Nash out with the sledgehammer, then put HHH on top of himself just to fuck with Laurenitis....

Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
Couldn't have said it better. I also wasn't a fan of the finish last night, and have been skeptical of the whole angle since Punk vs Nash was booked and rebooked to Punk vs Trips in one night. They have a HUGE opportunity in CM Punk right now, I'd hate to see them blow it on crappy writing/booking.badnewzxl wrote:I wanna know what else is gonna come of this but it's already kinda rubbing me the wrong way.

-
Styles
Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
I'll admit it comes across as a "we don't know where to take the angle" sort of booking. BUT You can understand EVERY interference from last night, Miz & Truth are all about conspiracy, Kevin Nash hates Punk and is pissed at his 20 year friend for "sacking" him.Bob-O wrote:Couldn't have said it better. I also wasn't a fan of the finish last night, and have been skeptical of the whole angle since Punk vs Nash was booked and rebooked to Punk vs Trips in one night. They have a HUGE opportunity in CM Punk right now, I'd hate to see them blow it on crappy writing/booking.badnewzxl wrote:I wanna know what else is gonna come of this but it's already kinda rubbing me the wrong way.
If I was a writer now I'd be pleading for McMahon & The Board (or some actors to portray the board)to do some TV time....
Here's how I would now run the angle. I'd have Triple H kick off Raw by cutting a promo & then inviting out Punk, then Miz & Truth invade chatting conspiracy and payback, then you have Laurinitis & Nash come down, it all spirals out of control & everyone is in the ring bickering and arguing, everyone is talking over one another you can't make sense of any of it and then BAM "NO CHANCE, THAT'S WHAT YOU GOT". Out comes McMahon with the board/actors. McMahon looks on and hits a promo about how Triple H clearly hasn't got control of things, and with the board concerned about his physical interaction with the talent, they're pulling the plug on Triple H & they're bringing backMcMahon to keep order on things.
McMahon can then tell Nash to get out as he doesn't even work here, tell Laurinitis his ass is toast, and then teases firing Triple H before saying he has a better idea... if he wants to remain in the WWE, he has to agree to one thing, a match, inside the cell with CM Punk, where there can be no interference. It's just him & Punk. It's either that, or the unemployment line. Triple H is clearly torn by this twist of events, but agrees anyway
Triple H goes in to HIAC, puts in a performance, goes down clean to Punk, Punk gets over & Triple H keeps a job of some sort albeit some form of "demotion".
Personally that's where I'd take it.
Last edited by Styles on Sep 19th, '11, 06:51, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
I LIKE IT.Styles wrote:I'll admit it comes across as a "we don't know where to take the angle" sort of booking. BUT You can understand EVERY interference from last night, Miz & Truth are all about conspiracy, Kevin Nash hates Punk and is pissed at his 20 year friend for "sacking" him.Bob-O wrote:Couldn't have said it better. I also wasn't a fan of the finish last night, and have been skeptical of the whole angle since Punk vs Nash was booked and rebooked to Punk vs Trips in one night. They have a HUGE opportunity in CM Punk right now, I'd hate to see them blow it on crappy writing/booking.badnewzxl wrote:I wanna know what else is gonna come of this but it's already kinda rubbing me the wrong way.
If I was a writer now I'd be pleading for McMahon & The Board (or some actors to portray the board)to do some TV time....
Here's how I would now run the angle. I'd have Triple H kick off Raw by cutting a promo & then inviting out Punk, then Miz & Truth invade chatting conspiracy and payback, then you have Laurinitis & Nash come down, it all spirals out of control & everyone is in the ring bickering and arguing, everyone is talking over one another you can't make sense of any of it and then BAM "NO CHANCE, THAT'S WHAT YOU GOT". Out comes McMahon with the board/actors. McMahon looks on and hits a promo about how Triple H clearly hasn't got control of things, and with the board concerned about his physical interaction with the talent, they're pulling the plug on Triple H & they're bringing backMcMahon to keep order on things.
McMahon then puts Triple H, Nash & Laurinitis against Miz, Truth & Punk in a match, those who lose can get out of town and get out of his company. Over the weeks that follow you can keep Triple H around more weeks to talk to Vince and convince him to let him back onside, let him remain in the WWE Offices & turn it to aTriple H/McMahon power struggle.
Personally that's where I'd take it. but somewhere in there, I'd put Punk & Triple in the cell, no interference. Punk goes clean.

-
Styles
Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
I changed it ever so slightly, the last paragraph regarding the match, it'd be a car crash and it'd make more sense if it went the way of my edit.kiel297 wrote:
I LIKE IT.
Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
Yeah; I knew Nash would get involved but why have him get involved when he did little to affect the finish? HHH had Punk beat earlier in the match. And why have Truth and Miz come out and have them not affect the finish either? In the end, it didn't matter that anybody came out bc the exact thing that was happening before the interference happend after the interference was neutralized....Bob-O wrote:Couldn't have said it better. I also wasn't a fan of the finish last night, and have been skeptical of the whole angle since Punk vs Nash was booked and rebooked to Punk vs Trips in one night. They have a HUGE opportunity in CM Punk right now, I'd hate to see them blow it on crappy writing/booking.badnewzxl wrote:I wanna know what else is gonna come of this but it's already kinda rubbing me the wrong way.

Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
So let me get this straight, Trips had Punk beat then Truth & Miz came out which didn't do anything then the same thing happened with Nash? I wouldn't say it hurts Punk but it sounds like a clusterf*ck in that match with all the interference that didn't seem to effect the finish.

Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
this was my feeling, i facepalmed after Kelly kept the title, i mean, it's not even like they're cutting promos about "you can't beat" and shit. I really didn't see the point in not giving Beth the title in her home townbadnewzxl wrote:I enjoyed this PPV up until the Divas title match. Really, WWE, you give us the SAME match we saw last month? And Cena beating Del Rio made me yawn; I'm not even interested in seeing where/if the feud goes from here.
then the Cena/del RIo. it's one of those that just makes you wonder, why would you even give him the title??

Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
That was my thought as well when i saw Cena had won the title. I was keeping tabs on PPV by checking in on here & wikipedia. In fact when i looked on wikipedia after Cena won it said:cero2k wrote:then the Cena/del RIo. it's one of those that just makes you wonder, why would you even give him the title??
Hidden text.
Got a bit of a chuckle from me. :p
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 14 guests