Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Tell it to the world!!
Post Reply
User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by yourcrapsweak » Jun 17th, '11, 20:43

I was looking around on the internets, and I came across a young wrestler Ryan Eagles. I've heard of him and seen a few of his matches before, but seeing his Facebook now made me think of this and post this.

Ryan Eagles wears facepaint and reminds me a lot of Muta. A lot of his mannerisms are that of Muta, if he were a dick heel. His facepaint is very eerie.
Hidden text.
Image

And it got me thinking, most wrestlers today are all the same. They have no gimmicks, and they're not marketable. Is the art of the gimmick being forgotten? Even in WWE, the gimmicks are becoming less and less distinguishable. Are gimmicks slowly fading out?
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by Big Red Machine » Jun 18th, '11, 00:59

It all depends on how you define "gimmick." Do you consider "Rednecks who just love fighting" a gimmick? That's the Briscoes' gimmick. Or how about the Colony? It is all a matter of perspective. I don't think that gimmicks are being forgotten. I think that the uniqueness of things is being lost. Everyone coming off of the indies wants to have the gimmick of "AWESOME TECHNICAL WRESTLER!" and therein lies the problem. Gimmicks (in most places... in CHIKARA and Wrestlicious they are alive and well) are not being looked at as being important, which, I think, is a very bad thing.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

ECWFlairfan
Posts: 510
Joined: Jan 4th, '11, 19:55

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by ECWFlairfan » Jun 18th, '11, 19:00

The problem with having a gimmick &/or a particular name is that the bigger companies in the US (WWE & TNA) want to own it & then when you leave you can't take it with you. (see Low-Ki/Senshi/WWE name-i can't remember)

CM Punk is the VERY last of a dead breed... & if he sells his name its over... I pray he doesn't. (unless its your real name which WWE is getting away from...for example Joe Hennig is Michael McGillicutty)

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by Big Red Machine » Jun 19th, '11, 00:22

ECWFlairfan wrote:The problem with having a gimmick &/or a particular name is that the bigger companies in the US (WWE & TNA) want to own it & then when you leave you can't take it with you. (see Low-Ki/Senshi/WWE name-i can't remember)

CM Punk is the VERY last of a dead breed... & if he sells his name its over... I pray he doesn't. (unless its your real name which WWE is getting away from...for example Joe Hennig is Michael McGillicutty)
That's not what he means by gimmick. He means gimmick as in "Jeff Jarrett's country singer gimmick."
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

User avatar
NWK
Posts: 167
Joined: Dec 17th, '10, 13:49

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by NWK » Jun 22nd, '11, 14:03

The problem is that people are melding their gimmicks directly after their favorite wrestlers. In a sense, what you get when you do that is a bunch of B-Rate Rocks or Bryan Danielsons. Honestly, people have forgotten how to be creative with their gimmicks, that's why promotions like Chikara are excelling, because the wrestlers are inventing imaginative, compelling characters to make us watch.
The Andy Rooney of WR, NWK

User avatar
kirbs2002
Posts: 967
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 17:04

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by kirbs2002 » Jun 22nd, '11, 14:05

NWK wrote:The problem is that people are melding their gimmicks directly after their favorite wrestlers. In a sense, what you get when you do that is a bunch of B-Rate Rocks or Bryan Danielsons.
Exactly this!

"Shaping your gimmick after your favorite wrestler is a recipe for failure."
-Harley Race
Reality TV is faker than "fake" wrestling!

"The views that I'm about to express are not necessarily those of anyone else but myself, but they ought to be and, in fact, they probably are"

User avatar
KILLdozer
Posts: 5930
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 22:54

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by KILLdozer » Jun 22nd, '11, 14:15

yea,,i would say ,"be yourself"

alot of big stars and well known stars were basically just an extension of themselves in reality(cant think of any examples at the time,) heck,my WWR character is pretty much me all over
When they come, they'll come at what you love.

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by Big Red Machine » Jun 22nd, '11, 14:24

kirbs2002 wrote:
NWK wrote:The problem is that people are melding their gimmicks directly after their favorite wrestlers. In a sense, what you get when you do that is a bunch of B-Rate Rocks or Bryan Danielsons.
Exactly this!

"Shaping your gimmick after your favorite wrestler is a recipe for failure."
-Harley Race
What they said
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by cero2k » Jun 22nd, '11, 14:30

I think the problems lies in both places. Wrestlers wanna be taken "seriously" and wanna play the ultimate technitian guy AND people dont buy goofy gimmicks in mainstream wrestling anymore.

Tna and roh think too much as themselves as real wrestling to wanna create goofy characters. They barely pulled suicide and nana off.

On the other hand, wwe, which is for kids and more mainstream, wont risk having a long term goofy gimmick like they used to because people wont relate to it. They wanna sell superstars and lets face it, a viking, a police officer, or a shaman may not be that easy to sell.ously" and wanna play the ultimate technitian guy AND people dont buy goofy gimmicks in mainstream wrestling anymore.

Tna and roh think too much as themselves as real wrestling to wanna create goofy characters. They barely pulled suicide and nana off.

On the other hand, wwe, which is for kids and more mainstream, wont risk having a long term goofy gimmick like they used to because people wont relate to it. They wanna sell superstars and lets face it, a viking, a police officer, or a shaman may not be that easy to sell.
Image

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by Big Red Machine » Jun 22nd, '11, 14:41

cero2k wrote:I think the problems lies in both places. Wrestlers wanna be taken "seriously" and wanna play the ultimate technitian guy AND people dont buy goofy gimmicks in mainstream wrestling anymore.

Tna and roh think too much as themselves as real wrestling to wanna create goofy characters. They barely pulled suicide and nana off.

On the other hand, wwe, which is for kids and more mainstream, wont risk having a long term goofy gimmick like they used to because people wont relate to it. They wanna sell superstars and lets face it, a viking, a police officer, or a shaman may not be that easy to sell.ously" and wanna play the ultimate technitian guy AND people dont buy goofy gimmicks in mainstream wrestling anymore.

Tna and roh think too much as themselves as real wrestling to wanna create goofy characters. They barely pulled suicide and nana off.

On the other hand, wwe, which is for kids and more mainstream, wont risk having a long term goofy gimmick like they used to because people wont relate to it. They wanna sell superstars and lets face it, a viking, a police officer, or a shaman may not be that easy to sell.
No goofy characters? The Bravados, Grizzly Redwood, Shore... all of these are goofy characters. What they are, though, is also, theoretically realistic. Such a person could actually exist. They are still gimmicks, yet are a long way away from something unrealistic, like, say, The Colony.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

kiel297
Posts: 1358
Joined: Dec 17th, '10, 03:23

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by kiel297 » Jun 22nd, '11, 17:41

Hi, I'm Santino Marella and I believe it's perfectly easy to get a goofy gimmick over.
Image

User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by cero2k » Jun 22nd, '11, 19:06

Big Red Machine wrote: No goofy characters? The Bravados, Grizzly Redwood, Shore... all of these are goofy characters. What they are, though, is also, theoretically realistic. Such a person could actually exist. They are still gimmicks, yet are a long way away from something unrealistic, like, say, The Colony.
that is what i mean about goofy, non-realistic (at some point). Bravados Redwood, or Santino don't stop being real people, what i'm seeing here as goofy gimmicks are guys like The Berzerker, Papa Shango, The Headshrinkers, Boogeyman, etc. That is the point where i think the art of gimmick has died for the most part.

I think gimmicks have gone from the imaginary character to the "there's people like that somewhere". With the exception of Taker, all gimmicks, goofy or not, are likeable to exist, even goldust.
Image

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by Big Red Machine » Jun 22nd, '11, 19:47

cero2k wrote:
Big Red Machine wrote: No goofy characters? The Bravados, Grizzly Redwood, Shore... all of these are goofy characters. What they are, though, is also, theoretically realistic. Such a person could actually exist. They are still gimmicks, yet are a long way away from something unrealistic, like, say, The Colony.
that is what i mean about goofy, non-realistic (at some point). Bravados Redwood, or Santino don't stop being real people, what i'm seeing here as goofy gimmicks are guys like The Berzerker, Papa Shango, The Headshrinkers, Boogeyman, etc. That is the point where i think the art of gimmick has died for the most part.

I think gimmicks have gone from the imaginary character to the "there's people like that somewhere". With the exception of Taker, all gimmicks, goofy or not, are likeable to exist, even goldust.
It reflects a major change in the business. Blame ECW.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

User avatar
Shogun Rua
Posts: 174
Joined: May 29th, '11, 22:12

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by Shogun Rua » Jun 22nd, '11, 20:19

kiel297 wrote:Hi, I'm Santino Marella and I believe it's perfectly easy to get a goofy gimmick over.
Where has his gimmick gotten him though?

User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by cero2k » Jun 22nd, '11, 20:20

Big Red Machine wrote:
It reflects a major change in the business. Blame ECW.
indeed, blame it on the indys to change the face of wrestling
Image

User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by yourcrapsweak » Jun 23rd, '11, 19:06

Shogun Rua wrote:
kiel297 wrote:Hi, I'm Santino Marella and I believe it's perfectly easy to get a goofy gimmick over.
Where has his gimmick gotten him though?
Blame the bookers, not the gimmick. And it doesn't matter if he hasn't won the world title or whatever, because he's insanely over.
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

kiel297
Posts: 1358
Joined: Dec 17th, '10, 03:23

Re: Is the Art of the Gimmick Being Forgotten?

Post by kiel297 » Jun 23rd, '11, 19:21

yourcrapsweak wrote:
Shogun Rua wrote:
kiel297 wrote:Hi, I'm Santino Marella and I believe it's perfectly easy to get a goofy gimmick over.
Where has his gimmick gotten him though?
Blame the bookers, not the gimmick. And it doesn't matter if he hasn't won the world title or whatever, because he's insanely over.
This. Being over doesn't necessarily equate to being in a top spot. The WWE Internet Champion Zack Ryder can tell you that.
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests