WWE Championship

vs.
World Heavyweight Championship

Think about it though. For the majority of the past 5 years or so the WWE Championship match closes out a PPV. They play hot potato with the World title, they've had 5 different title reigns recognized this year while the WWE title has had 2. Ziggler was given a bullsh*t title reign that did nothing except give Edge another title reign, they could have really ran with Ziggler as the champion. Sure he didnt win the title by conventional means but if he'd kept it and continued putting on great matches it would have been great.yourcrapsweak wrote:I don't think they care about either one more than the other, it's just a matter of who they want representing what show.
They kept the Divas title in favor of the Women's belt.....cero2k wrote:I'm gonna say that if one needed to go, it would easily be the WHC, the other one still has the history going back to Rogers, while the WHC only goes back til Trips
And I see them unifying the titles at some point & ending the history of the WWE champion, just like the tag team & Women's title histories...Rabid619 wrote:They kept the Divas title in favor of the Women's belt.....cero2k wrote:I'm gonna say that if one needed to go, it would easily be the WHC, the other one still has the history going back to Rogers, while the WHC only goes back til Trips
while this is true, we ARE talking about the two divisions that the E doesn't give a damn about. they should be lucky there's a title for each division.ECWFlairfan wrote:
And I see them unifying the titles at some point & ending the history of the WWE champion, just like the tag team & Women's title histories...
This. The lineage of the WWE championship is the history of the WWE since its inception.cero2k wrote:I'm gonna say that if one needed to go, it would easily be the WHC, the other one still has the history going back to Rogers, while the WHC only goes back til Trips
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests