BOTB: Promoton Name
Posted: Dec 19th, '10, 13:46
Which promotion has the coolest name? Total Non-Stop Action? Chikara? Combat Zone Wrestling?
http://thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/
I like it bc when you actually realize that they don't mean the animal, it makes perfect sense bc it's run by the wrestlers, not a promoter or any other third party. The name suggests that the guys are doing it purely out of love for the craft and the use of the word Guerrilla implies revolution and independence, and I dig that.....The Awesome One wrote:I don't like the PWR name. The guerrilla bit makes me think of a actual gorilla, and therefore, the name cannot be taken seriously.badnewzxl wrote:Ring of Honor
Wrestling and Romance
Pro Wrestling Guerrilla
At the same time, the logo is a of a Gorilla, not a Guerrilla. The promotion enjoys silliness in a much more... (for lack of a better term) adult way than CHIKARA does. They chose the name to be goofy.badnewzxl wrote:I like it bc when you actually realize that they don't mean the animal, it makes perfect sense bc it's run by the wrestlers, not a promoter or any other third party. The name suggests that the guys are doing it purely out of love for the craft and the use of the word Guerrilla implies revolution and independence, and I dig that.....The Awesome One wrote:I don't like the PWR name. The guerrilla bit makes me think of a actual gorilla, and therefore, the name cannot be taken seriously.badnewzxl wrote:Ring of Honor
Wrestling and Romance
Pro Wrestling Guerrilla
It is hard to describe. In the ring, aside form comedy, it is all serious, but the team names can be extremely funny. For example, the current tag team champions, Paul London & El Generico, are known as ¡Peligro Abejas!, which is apprently Spanish for "DANGER: BEES!"The Awesome One wrote:So they try to be silly but....not?
and postersBig Red Machine wrote:
Search for "PWG commentary moments on youtube and you'll see what I mean. Also, find a list of the names of their shows.
bc there is no pic of a Guerrilla; there's not a standard visual representation of Guerrillas. So they go with the pun.Big Red Machine wrote:At the same time, the logo is a of a Gorilla, not a Guerrilla. .
The craft of wrestling? This is PWG we're talking about here.badnewzxl wrote:bc there is no pic of a Guerrilla; there's not a standard visual representation of Guerrillas. So they go with the pun.Big Red Machine wrote:At the same time, the logo is a of a Gorilla, not a Guerrilla. .
But my point was that the use of the word Guerrilla implies an underground type feel; I like that. It shows that they aren't focussed on the mainstream approach to "sports ent," but more the craft of WRESTLING.....
what point are you making? I'm confused.Big Red Machine wrote:The craft of wrestling? This is PWG we're talking about here.badnewzxl wrote:bc there is no pic of a Guerrilla; there's not a standard visual representation of Guerrillas. So they go with the pun.Big Red Machine wrote:At the same time, the logo is a of a Gorilla, not a Guerrilla. .
But my point was that the use of the word Guerrilla implies an underground type feel; I like that. It shows that they aren't focussed on the mainstream approach to "sports ent," but more the craft of WRESTLING.....
Yes, they put on good wrestling, but too much of the time PWG doesn't take itself seriously. The silliness is mostly in the naming of shows and titles, and in the announcing. It just feels awkward to me because the silliness feels like it is coming in from outside. Yes, it's funny, but it is awkward enough that it mkaes it hard for me to enjoy the wrestling. Compare that to CHIKARA, which takes itself completely seriously WITHIN it's own silliness. Without the announcing and names, PWG just seems like any other promotion. It has its presegious events (BOLA, the DDT4s, etc.), it has its characters and its great feuds (Hero vs. Tornado, Steen vs. Super Dragon, etc,). The silliness all comes from what are, for lack of a better term "non-wrestling" sources. In a company like CHIKARA (or even HUSTLE or Wreestlicious), the silliness comes from the inside out. It originates with the gimmicks and the action in the ring, and the announcers and the company therefore take that silliness seriously.badnewzxl wrote:what point are you making? I'm confused.Big Red Machine wrote:The craft of wrestling? This is PWG we're talking about here.
I know they're silly and all, but they still put on great PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING MATCHES; which some times include that comedy. Ya know, the theatrics; like in stage shows and other live performances. That's how professional wrestling has always been. WWE (and often times WCW and TNA too) run their shows more like a movie or recorded show. When I see a WWE live event or an episode of RAW in person it sucks. But when I go home and watch the televised RAW that I saw in person it's def better bc they have the commentary and the camera shots the show is DESIGNED to use and tell their stories. A lot of places either try to replicate the WWE/sports ent style or ignore it completely and focus JUST on wrestling. I feel like PWG maintains the hardcore, intense wrestling places like EVOLVE, ROH, and DGUSA emphasis, while still providing a type of ent designed for pretty much EVERYONE to enjoy.
PWG is silly, but they still make sure to have AWESOME wrestling!
While this is kinda true, I think badnewz is still right. PWG IS balanced enough to provide a little something for everybody. Have you ever watched an entire show?Big Red Machine wrote:Yes, they put on good wrestling, but too much of the time PWG doesn't take itself seriously. The silliness is mostly in the naming of shows and titles, and in the announcing. It just feels awkward to me because the silliness feels like it is coming in from outside. Yes, it's funny, but it is awkward enough that it mkaes it hard for me to enjoy the wrestling. Compare that to CHIKARA, which takes itself completely seriously WITHIN it's own silliness. Without the announcing and names, PWG just seems like any other promotion. It has its presegious events (BOLA, the DDT4s, etc.), it has its characters and its great feuds (Hero vs. Tornado, Steen vs. Super Dragon, etc,). The silliness all comes from what are, for lack of a better term "non-wrestling" sources. In a company like CHIKARA (or even HUSTLE or Wreestlicious), the silliness comes from the inside out. It originates with the gimmicks and the action in the ring, and the announcers and the company therefore take that silliness seriously.
I don't think that PWG is designed for everyone to enjoy. It is designed for people with a certain sense of humor (that of its creators), the same way that CHIKARA is, and the same way that ultraviolent wrestling caters to those who enjoy it, and "pure" wrestling promotions like EVOLVE or NOAH cater to those who enjoy just that.
The companies that I think are designed for everyone to enjoy are the companies that mix a little bit of everything (ROH and TNA being the most prominent). Some companies like CHIKARA, WWE, or AAA can go WAAAAAYYYYYY overboard when it comes to the (for lack of a better word) "cartoonishness" of their angles and/or characters, while others barely touch angles at all (NOAH). Others (like Evolve now or early ROH [I wonder why?)] limit themsleves in an attempt to appeal to small niche, or to make themselves "interesting enough to check out once," and hope that they can hook you with that one show. Some companies go too far on the violence (CZW, IWA-MS, and other ultraviolent promotions), while others shy away from more extreme violence, even when they should be going there (WWE). Obviously, this appeals to osome people, but not to others, because it was designed to do so. I'm sure CZW doesn't think they will ever make a fan out of me without DRASTIC changes to their promotion which it would be assine of them to make becuase it would alienate the loyal fans that they currently have (the problem that post-2004 has had). In order for a company to appeal to everyone, it needs to find a balance.
No, but I have seen large chunks.yourcrapsweak wrote:While this is kinda true, I think badnewz is still right. PWG IS balanced enough to provide a little something for everybody. Have you ever watched an entire show?Big Red Machine wrote:Yes, they put on good wrestling, but too much of the time PWG doesn't take itself seriously. The silliness is mostly in the naming of shows and titles, and in the announcing. It just feels awkward to me because the silliness feels like it is coming in from outside. Yes, it's funny, but it is awkward enough that it mkaes it hard for me to enjoy the wrestling. Compare that to CHIKARA, which takes itself completely seriously WITHIN it's own silliness. Without the announcing and names, PWG just seems like any other promotion. It has its presegious events (BOLA, the DDT4s, etc.), it has its characters and its great feuds (Hero vs. Tornado, Steen vs. Super Dragon, etc,). The silliness all comes from what are, for lack of a better term "non-wrestling" sources. In a company like CHIKARA (or even HUSTLE or Wreestlicious), the silliness comes from the inside out. It originates with the gimmicks and the action in the ring, and the announcers and the company therefore take that silliness seriously.
I don't think that PWG is designed for everyone to enjoy. It is designed for people with a certain sense of humor (that of its creators), the same way that CHIKARA is, and the same way that ultraviolent wrestling caters to those who enjoy it, and "pure" wrestling promotions like EVOLVE or NOAH cater to those who enjoy just that.
The companies that I think are designed for everyone to enjoy are the companies that mix a little bit of everything (ROH and TNA being the most prominent). Some companies like CHIKARA, WWE, or AAA can go WAAAAAYYYYYY overboard when it comes to the (for lack of a better word) "cartoonishness" of their angles and/or characters, while others barely touch angles at all (NOAH). Others (like Evolve now or early ROH [I wonder why?)] limit themsleves in an attempt to appeal to small niche, or to make themselves "interesting enough to check out once," and hope that they can hook you with that one show. Some companies go too far on the violence (CZW, IWA-MS, and other ultraviolent promotions), while others shy away from more extreme violence, even when they should be going there (WWE). Obviously, this appeals to osome people, but not to others, because it was designed to do so. I'm sure CZW doesn't think they will ever make a fan out of me without DRASTIC changes to their promotion which it would be assine of them to make becuase it would alienate the loyal fans that they currently have (the problem that post-2004 has had). In order for a company to appeal to everyone, it needs to find a balance.