Page 1 of 1

WOTW: Royal Rumble

Posted: Jan 23rd, '12, 10:51
by Rabid619
There have been some bad Rumbles of the years, which is the worst of the worst?

Re: WOTW: Royal Rumble

Posted: Jan 23rd, '12, 17:43
by yourcrapsweak
'97. It was good but there was such a lack of star power, they had to use a bunch of AAA guys who were not over at all and probably confused. Hell, Mil Mascaras eliminated himself.

Re: WOTW: Royal Rumble

Posted: Jan 28th, '12, 17:07
by Big Bad Booty Daddy
99 for me.

Generally because McMahon won it. Also the fact McMahon and Austin were last two yet speant most of the rumble out of the ring!!!

Re: WOTW: Royal Rumble

Posted: Jan 29th, '12, 16:18
by yourcrapsweak
Big Bad Booty Daddy wrote:99 for me.

Generally because McMahon won it. Also the fact McMahon and Austin were last two yet speant most of the rumble out of the ring!!!
Not only that, but the Rumble was an afterthought because of that storyline. Plus, there wasn't ANYONE in there who you were like "oh maybe they could win!" It was Austin all the way and there was no doubt in anybody's mind that someone like Ken Shamrock or Billy Gunn would win.

Re: WOTW: Royal Rumble

Posted: Jan 29th, '12, 17:25
by kiel297
'99 is one of my favourite rumbles. But then, that's the first wrestling I ever watched. I fucking loved it.