Page 1 of 1
Which belt does WWE care more about?
Posted: May 7th, '11, 14:48
by Rabid619
Which world title do you think WWE cares more about right now? The WWE Championship or the World Heavyweight Championship?
WWE Championship
vs.
World Heavyweight Championship

Re: Which belt does WWE care more about?
Posted: May 7th, '11, 15:22
by yourcrapsweak
I don't think they care about either one more than the other, it's just a matter of who they want representing what show.
Re: Which belt does WWE care more about?
Posted: May 7th, '11, 15:54
by Rabid619
yourcrapsweak wrote:I don't think they care about either one more than the other, it's just a matter of who they want representing what show.
Think about it though. For the majority of the past 5 years or so the WWE Championship match closes out a PPV. They play hot potato with the World title, they've had 5 different title reigns recognized this year while the WWE title has had 2. Ziggler was given a bullsh*t title reign that did nothing except give Edge another title reign, they could have really ran with Ziggler as the champion. Sure he didnt win the title by conventional means but if he'd kept it and continued putting on great matches it would have been great.
Re: Which belt does WWE care more about?
Posted: May 7th, '11, 19:39
by cero2k
I'm gonna say that if one needed to go, it would easily be the WHC, the other one still has the history going back to Rogers, while the WHC only goes back til Trips
Re: Which belt does WWE care more about?
Posted: May 7th, '11, 19:52
by Rabid619
cero2k wrote:I'm gonna say that if one needed to go, it would easily be the WHC, the other one still has the history going back to Rogers, while the WHC only goes back til Trips
They kept the Divas title in favor of the Women's belt.....
Re: Which belt does WWE care more about?
Posted: May 7th, '11, 21:26
by ECWFlairfan
Rabid619 wrote:cero2k wrote:I'm gonna say that if one needed to go, it would easily be the WHC, the other one still has the history going back to Rogers, while the WHC only goes back til Trips
They kept the Divas title in favor of the Women's belt.....
And I see them unifying the titles at some point & ending the history of the WWE champion, just like the tag team & Women's title histories...
Re: Which belt does WWE care more about?
Posted: May 7th, '11, 23:46
by cero2k
ECWFlairfan wrote:
And I see them unifying the titles at some point & ending the history of the WWE champion, just like the tag team & Women's title histories...
while this is true, we ARE talking about the two divisions that the E doesn't give a damn about. they should be lucky there's a title for each division.
Re: Which belt does WWE care more about?
Posted: Jun 4th, '11, 20:02
by e-moose
cero2k wrote:I'm gonna say that if one needed to go, it would easily be the WHC, the other one still has the history going back to Rogers, while the WHC only goes back til Trips
This. The lineage of the WWE championship is the history of the WWE since its inception.