Source: www.F4WOnline.com

By Joseph Currier | @josephcurrier | May 31, 2019 1:53 pm


WWE is again teasing that Brock Lesnar will cash in his Money in the Bank briefcase on Raw.

Paul Heyman posted a video today announcing that Lesnar is cashing in his Money in the Bank briefcase on this coming Monday's episode of Raw between the hours of 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. Eastern time. Heyman said Lesnar would be cashing in on Universal Champion Seth Rollins.

On Twitter, Rollins responded to Heyman's video: "Dude 'won' his MITB contract without even participating in a match. Now is 'cashing it in' via his advocate on social media. Who even is @BrockLesnar anymore? Hope you’re not lying Paul; bring this goon to Raw so I can stomp out what’s left of him."

WWE.com also posted an article about Heyman's announcement and added it to the Raw preview.

The announcement comes the day after WWE furthered Lesnar's storyline by uploading a video where Stephanie McMahon said that WWE condemns Lesnar and Heyman's behavior on this week's Raw. Lesnar pretended the briefcase was a boombox and didn't reveal which champion he was going to cash in on, instead finding out that he has a year to do so.

Stephanie said Lesnar and Heyman disrespected what the Money in the Bank briefcase represents, Rollins and WWE Champion Kofi Kingston, and WWE and its fans. The video ended with her saying she would take up the issue with the McMahon family and their executive team and promised that they would take action.

Monday's Raw is the go-home show for Super ShowDown, which is taking place in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia on Friday, June 7. The Undertaker will be appearing on the episode ahead of his match against Goldberg in Saudi Arabia.

Rollins defending the Universal title against Baron Corbin has been announced for Super ShowDown.

I hope no one tunes in, just to punish them for this bullsh*ttery.

Big Red Machine wrote: ↑May 31st, '19, 15:01 I hope no one tunes in, just to punish them for this bullsh*ttery.

you can count on me

Big Red Machine wrote: ↑May 31st, '19, 15:01 I hope no one tunes in, just to punish them for this bullsh*ttery.

I on the other hand, will do it just to spite you.

NWK2000 wrote: ↑May 31st, '19, 15:45

Big Red Machine wrote: ↑May 31st, '19, 15:01 I hope no one tunes in, just to punish them for this bullsh*ttery.

I on the other hand, will do it just to spite you.

I'll be watching, too, but I don't have Nielsen box so I don't count, and I doubt you have one either, so you (probably) can't do it to spite me because you also (probably) don't count.

Big Red Machine wrote: ↑May 31st, '19, 16:12

NWK2000 wrote: ↑May 31st, '19, 15:45

Big Red Machine wrote: ↑May 31st, '19, 15:01 I hope no one tunes in, just to punish them for this bullsh*ttery.

I on the other hand, will do it just to spite you.

I'll be watching, too, but I don't have Nielsen box so I don't count, and I doubt you have one either, so you (probably) can't do it to spite me because you also (probably) don't count.

On a slightly off topic note, have you ever looked into how to get a Nelsen box and how it effects/tracks your viewing experience.? I did just now, because it occurred to me I didn't know. It's fucked up, ridiculously exploitable and unbelievable how we're still using that technology to glean interest in TV programs?
https://www.vulture.com/2015/12/nielsen ... -like.html

Fat bald liar.

Big Red Machine wrote: ↑May 31st, '19, 15:01 I hope no one tunes in, just to punish them for this bullsh*ttery.

Does PVR count as a viewer?

Serujuunin wrote: ↑Jun 1st, '19, 15:09

Big Red Machine wrote: ↑May 31st, '19, 15:01 I hope no one tunes in, just to punish them for this bullsh*ttery.

Does PVR count as a viewer?

They do seem to have some way to track that.

Big Red Machine wrote: ↑Jun 1st, '19, 22:59

Serujuunin wrote: ↑Jun 1st, '19, 15:09

Big Red Machine wrote: ↑May 31st, '19, 15:01 I hope no one tunes in, just to punish them for this bullsh*ttery.

Does PVR count as a viewer?

They do seem to have some way to track that.

BOO. I'll have to turn the recording off and find it online somewhere later.

Big Red Machine wrote: ↑May 31st, '19, 15:01 The announcement comes the day after WWE furthered Lesnar's storyline by uploading a video where Stephanie McMahon said that WWE condemns Lesnar and Heyman's behavior on this week's Raw. Lesnar pretended the briefcase was a boombox and didn't reveal which champion he was going to cash in on, instead finding out that he has a year to do so.

Stephanie said Lesnar and Heyman disrespected what the Money in the Bank briefcase represents, Rollins and WWE Champion Kofi Kingston, and WWE and its fans. The video ended with her saying she would take up the issue with the McMahon family and their executive team and promised that they would take action

Oh my god... shut up. It's a goddamn toy.

However, I will say that in ONE uploaded video that nobody watched, Stephanie managed to make this airbrushed weapon more prestigious than all three sets of tag team titles... so there's that.

so, if Lesnar is being 'forced' to cash in and has already been publicly announced to be doing so. Does Kofi Kingston showing up for the Wildcard Rule make him incredibly stupid or a valiant babyface?

Let it known that Kofi and Lesnar once fought and well, the match lasted 2:38 minutes.

cero2k wrote: ↑Jun 2nd, '19, 10:14 so, if Lesnar is being 'forced' to cash in and has already been publicly announced to be doing so. Does Kofi Kingston showing up for the Wildcard Rule make him incredibly stupid or a valiant babyface?

Let it known that Kofi and Lesnar once fought and well, the match lasted 2:38 minutes.

Valiant, but only because he's pushed so hard for Brock to challenge him, to the point where he can't not show up.

Intesreting question we've never seen done before...but could he challenge BOTH at once ? Sure it's only one contract ...but isn't it "any kind of match he wants?"

So could he demand a match with Both titles on the line?

KILLdozer wrote: ↑Jun 2nd, '19, 11:35 Intesreting question we've never seen done before...but could he challenge BOTH at once ? Sure it's only one contract ...but isn't it "any kind of match he wants?"

So could he demand a match with Both titles on the line?

i don't think he can, nor I think you can add stipulations to such match, at least it hasn't happened yet. Now, if Rollins and Kofi were to have a unification match and he inserts himself into the match, that's another story.

KILLdozer wrote: ↑Jun 2nd, '19, 11:35 Intesreting question we've never seen done before...but could he challenge BOTH at once ? Sure it's only one contract ...but isn't it "any kind of match he wants?"

So could he demand a match with Both titles on the line?

It's not "any kind of match he wants." It's a match against either champion at any time he wants. He can't challenge both or choose the match type.

Big Red Machine wrote: ↑Jun 2nd, '19, 11:44

KILLdozer wrote: ↑Jun 2nd, '19, 11:35 Intesreting question we've never seen done before...but could he challenge BOTH at once ? Sure it's only one contract ...but isn't it "any kind of match he wants?"

So could he demand a match with Both titles on the line?

It's not "any kind of match he wants." It's a match against either champion at any time he wants. He can't challenge both or choose the match type.

Some reason I figured it was "a match of his choosing", but obviously not.

If the article is to be believed as written, Heyman says Brock is cashing in on Rollins specifically.

BIG FAT SWERVE.