Is it the Beginning of the End of TNA?
Posted: Mar 18th, '11, 17:12
With TNA sinking further into oblivion (quoting someone from this board, I forgot who so forgive me), do you think they will go under soon?
http://thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/
http://thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1888
That.badnewzxl wrote:Nah; SPIKE still seems to like them a lot. Once that relationship sours, then you can ring the bell
Their crowds used to be good now they're just plain stupid.kirbs2002 wrote:badnewzxl wrote: As for filling the Impact Zone, between moronic plants and clueless tourists, they will always have a full house.
It was AOL who didn't want anything to do with wrestling.kirbs2002 wrote:That.badnewzxl wrote:Nah; SPIKE still seems to like them a lot. Once that relationship sours, then you can ring the bell
That's why WCW ultimately got bought out, because Time Warner didn't like wrestling (for all the crap WCW pulled in its last year, who can blame them?). As long as Spike TV likes TNA Wrestling, they will continue to pour money into it. As for filling the Impact Zone, between moronic plants and clueless tourists, they will always have a full house.
The only thing that the crowd says at the Impact Zone is when they chant. JOE IS GONNA KILL YOU. Other then that there retardsRabid619 wrote: Their crowds used to be good now they're just plain stupid.
This. It'll be a crapstream sitting at 1.0 ratings for a while yet before anything happens... it'll either take new management blood to lift it or a serious meltdown to drop off.Big Red Machine wrote:Neither. I don't see it getting better any time soon, but it won't go under soon either.
None of whom they can make any money off of.kirbs2002 wrote:As for filling the Impact Zone, between moronic plants and clueless tourists, they will always have a full house.
Yep; as STUPID as iMPACT! has gotten, they fit in PERFECTLY with SPIKE's programming. I mean, they've got some good shows on there, but a lot of them are good in the sense that they're stupid (i.e. 1000 Ways to Die, Blue Mountain State, etc)yourcrapsweak wrote:It was AOL who didn't want anything to do with wrestling.kirbs2002 wrote:That.badnewzxl wrote:Nah; SPIKE still seems to like them a lot. Once that relationship sours, then you can ring the bell
That's why WCW ultimately got bought out, because Time Warner didn't like wrestling (for all the crap WCW pulled in its last year, who can blame them?). As long as Spike TV likes TNA Wrestling, they will continue to pour money into it. As for filling the Impact Zone, between moronic plants and clueless tourists, they will always have a full house.
And I think once the ratings start to sink, Spike will realize that TNA isn't worth their time. Spike doesn't know the difference between a good wrestling show and a shitty one, all they know is they're "a channel for men" and men like wrestling. Spike will only drop them if their ratings go down.
There's also Japan, Mexico, Canada, Europe, and a good number of other American Indy's to choose from, too. But TNA isn't going anywhere anytime soon, bro. They are terrible right now, but we're really the only one's who notice. TNA has hooked enough casual fans to stay afloat for a good while longer....ECWFlairfan wrote:I want TNA to make a comeback & actually compete with WWE, but sadly... I'll be suprised if TNA is still around this summer... and that is sad to the actual WRESTLING TALENT that is in that organization... they'll have to choose ROH (who will let you wrestle but does not have a major TV outlet) or WWE (who is on everywhere but will not let you actually wrestle)...
It's not the causal fans. Casual fans generally don't pay for PPVs. The thing that will keep them afloat is Panda.badnewzxl wrote:
There's also Japan, Mexico, Canada, Europe, and a good number of other American Indy's to choose from, too. But TNA isn't going anywhere anytime soon, bro. They are terrible right now, but we're really the only one's who notice. TNA has hooked enough casual fans to stay afloat for a good while longer....
The support of the casual fans is what will keep Panda funding TNA. Casual fans don't buy ppv's, but they will pick up some merchandise while they're at Universal Studios. Casual fans will still watch iMPACT! and keep the ratings where they are, thus satisfying the network. And, some ppl actually LIKE TNA the way it is bc it's so different from the wrestling everyone is familiar with (by everyone, I mean the mainstream. People really were not watching WCW when it was as ridiculous as TNA is right now. Plus, the American public nowadays is as ridiculous as TNA. iMPACT! is awful, but awful in the same ways that Jersey Shore is.)Big Red Machine wrote:It's not the causal fans. Casual fans generally don't pay for PPVs. The thing that will keep them afloat is Panda.badnewzxl wrote:
There's also Japan, Mexico, Canada, Europe, and a good number of other American Indy's to choose from, too. But TNA isn't going anywhere anytime soon, bro. They are terrible right now, but we're really the only one's who notice. TNA has hooked enough casual fans to stay afloat for a good while longer....
I mean major money making promotions in the United States... which if TNA should fail leaves the WWE with the big money & Ring of Honor if you just want to squeak by... speaking of Panda, if they had backed ECW then they would be #2 right now, not TNA nor ROH...badnewzxl wrote:ECWFlairfan wrote:There's also Japan, Mexico, Canada, Europe, and a good number of other American Indy's to choose from, too. But TNA isn't going anywhere anytime soon, bro. They are terrible right now, but we're really the only one's who notice. TNA has hooked enough casual fans to stay afloat for a good while longer....
Oh, for sure. But, having names from TNA join a smaller org will only build those orgs up, just like TNA and ROH featured a lot of former WCW and ECW guys in their infancy....ECWFlairfan wrote:I mean major money making promotions in the United States... which if TNA should fail leaves the WWE with the big money & Ring of Honor if you just want to squeak by... speaking of Panda, if they had backed ECW then they would be #2 right now, not TNA nor ROH...badnewzxl wrote:ECWFlairfan wrote:There's also Japan, Mexico, Canada, Europe, and a good number of other American Indy's to choose from, too. But TNA isn't going anywhere anytime soon, bro. They are terrible right now, but we're really the only one's who notice. TNA has hooked enough casual fans to stay afloat for a good while longer....
e-moose wrote:Sonic, I don't believe that any of your predictions will come true, nor do I believe that your assertion that Hogan is jealous of Sting stealing his '90s spotlight is at all true.
As for TNA's survival, I had predicted back in November that TNA would either be off TV at New Year's 2011, or in September of 2011, when the new TV "season" begins. My first deadline has passed. I hadn't watched impact! since November but I caught about half an hour of this past impact!, and it seemed even worse. If TNA impact! is not replaced on Spike TV come September, I will be incredibly suprised.