Page 1 of 1

Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 9th, '16, 17:17
by Big Red Machine
Apparently after the PPV taping went off the air, they taped a match where Matt Hardy won the world title from EC III in a double-turn, with Matt & Brodus now being a heel pairing while Ethan is a babyface.


1. A huge waste of Ethan's first pinfall, and also an eye-rolling one when you consider just how f*cking sick everyone is of TNA's overbooking.
2. A stupid idea because Matt is a beloved face and well-respected veteran while Ethan is a great heel.

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 9th, '16, 21:54
by XIV
I don't watch TNA anymore, but I read about this.
Fact is, a wrestler gets to a point in their career where they can no longer be a heel. A crowd has spent nearly 20 years appreciating what Matt Hardy has brought to wrestling and respect him hugely for it, having Matt Hardy as a heel world champion does nothing right now for TNA or Matt Hardy's career.

Ethan Carter is the best heel TNA had. Shame. The whole spoiled entitled thing was working for him.

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 9th, '16, 22:54
by Big Red Machine
This isn't as bad as the other one, but still...
Hidden text.
*The Wolves vs. Crazzy Steve and Abyss ended in a DQ when a woman dressed as a clown interfered.
Come the f*ck on!

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 05:09
by XIV
Big Red Machine wrote:This isn't as bad as the other one, but still...
Hidden text.
*The Wolves vs. Crazzy Steve and Abyss ended in a DQ when a woman dressed as a clown interfered.
Come the f*ck on!

That is the most WCW thing I have ever read.

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 05:48
by badnewzxl
XIV wrote:
Big Red Machine wrote:This isn't as bad as the other one, but still...
Hidden text.
*The Wolves vs. Crazzy Steve and Abyss ended in a DQ when a woman dressed as a clown interfered.
Come the f*ck on!

That is the most WCW thing I have ever read.
How is that a wcw thing?

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 08:38
by KILLdozer
Just that "yo-ho hahaha it's so ridiculous it must be like a WCW" is what it seems like. I found this whole topic hilarious for some reason!

Clown suit?!? Chill out though boys before you freak out -maybe....it's Steve's...idk Circus relative?

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 12:58
by cero2k
Big Red Machine wrote:This isn't as bad as the other one, but still...
Hidden text.
*The Wolves vs. Crazzy Steve and Abyss ended in a DQ when a woman dressed as a clown interfered.
Come the f*ck on!
this actually has my interest, was it a sexy clown?

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 15:04
by Big Red Machine
KILLdozer wrote:Just that "yo-ho hahaha it's so ridiculous it must be like a WCW" is what it seems like. I found this whole topic hilarious for some reason!

Clown suit?!? Chill out though boys before you freak out -maybe....it's Steve's...idk Circus relative?
I'm not saying it can't make sense. I'm saying that Steve's clown gimmick is f*cking stupid, why the hell would you bring in a second clown?

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 15:05
by Big Red Machine
badnewzxl wrote:
XIV wrote:
Big Red Machine wrote:This isn't as bad as the other one, but still...
Hidden text.
*The Wolves vs. Crazzy Steve and Abyss ended in a DQ when a woman dressed as a clown interfered.
Come the f*ck on!

That is the most WCW thing I have ever read.
How is that a wcw thing?
Because it's completely goofy, and instead of getting rid of a bad, pointless character, they are instead giving him a bigger role.

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 15:38
by XIV
Big Red Machine wrote:
badnewzxl wrote:
XIV wrote:

That is the most WCW thing I have ever read.
How is that a wcw thing?
Because it's completely goofy, and instead of getting rid of a bad, pointless character, they are instead giving him a bigger role.
It's goofy, it's ridiculous, it's unecessary , it's pointless and it leaves you wondering just who thought this was a good idea and why are the running with it?

Everything late 90's WCW booking used to invoke.

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 16:50
by badnewzxl
How can you base the entire reputation of a promotion on one damn year?

At this point, that's just a TNA thing. WCW was like that for a year between 99 and 2000 and a good part of 95, but TNA has done this off and on for its entire existence. WCW did it and it killed them but TNA has adopted this and ran with it for a decade and a half.

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 16:54
by Big Red Machine
badnewzxl wrote:How can you base the entire reputation of a promotion on one damn year?

At this point, that's just a TNA thing. WCW was like that for a year between 99 and 2000 and a good part of 95, but TNA has done this off and on for its entire existence. WCW did it and it killed them but TNA has adopted this and ran with it for a decade and a half.
Fair enough.

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 16:58
by Big Red Machine
In an unrelated but also ridiculous spoiler, they brought in Gabi from Tough Enough (who has worked so few matches that she doesn't even have a profile on CageMatch.net). She apparently warned Lashley that " the next time she sees him, she can bring pain or pleasure."

Well... that sounds corny as all hell.

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 18:45
by KILLdozer
It sounds "nasty" , as in Cleveland Brown "that's nasty! ", is more like it.

Re: Proof that TNA Will Never Ever Ever Learn (BIG SPOILERS)

Posted: Jan 10th, '16, 18:46
by KILLdozer
Big Red Machine wrote:
KILLdozer wrote:Just that "yo-ho hahaha it's so ridiculous it must be like a WCW" is what it seems like. I found this whole topic hilarious for some reason!

Clown suit?!? Chill out though boys before you freak out -maybe....it's Steve's...idk Circus relative?
I'm not saying it can't make sense. I'm saying that Steve's clown gimmick is f*cking stupid, why the hell would you bring in a second clown?
Oh...just to be funny and more amusing is the idea I tend to get from things generally.