Yeah. Because THIS is the Thing TNA Needed to Fix
Posted: Jun 16th, '15, 09:19
http://thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/
http://thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15416
by argument of the spinner belt, if it's ugly, it's best to change it whether it's become iconic or notBig Red Machine wrote:And on a more general note, I HATE when companies just randomly redesign a belt because. I honestly think that every single belt redesign since 2005 has been progressively worse (in ROH, TNA, and WWE. Belts become iconic because people are used to seeing them. No one is going to get used to seeing the belt if you keep switching it up, and changing it up so often just makes changing it up mean even less.
Yes... except that the new WWE World Heavyweight Title is almost as bad, and all of the other changes (aside from arguably the change to the current TNA World Heavyweight Title) have all been changes to uglier belts.cero2k wrote:by argument of the spinner belt, if it's ugly, it's best to change it whether it's become iconic or notBig Red Machine wrote:And on a more general note, I HATE when companies just randomly redesign a belt because. I honestly think that every single belt redesign since 2005 has been progressively worse (in ROH, TNA, and WWE. Belts become iconic because people are used to seeing them. No one is going to get used to seeing the belt if you keep switching it up, and changing it up so often just makes changing it up mean even less.
and thus i would approve for a new WWE World Heavyweight TitleBig Red Machine wrote:Yes... except that the new WWE World Heavyweight Title is almost as bad, and all of the other changes (aside from arguably the change to the current TNA World Heavyweight Title) have all been changes to uglier belts.cero2k wrote:by argument of the spinner belt, if it's ugly, it's best to change it whether it's become iconic or notBig Red Machine wrote:And on a more general note, I HATE when companies just randomly redesign a belt because. I honestly think that every single belt redesign since 2005 has been progressively worse (in ROH, TNA, and WWE. Belts become iconic because people are used to seeing them. No one is going to get used to seeing the belt if you keep switching it up, and changing it up so often just makes changing it up mean even less.
how is it dumb? they made the title better and didn't waste money, kuddos for themBig Red Machine wrote:I just read that is the same title belt with a paint-job, which is not only dumb, but it will look embarrassing when the paint starts to chip.
1. I don't think the title is better this way.cero2k wrote:how is it dumb? they made the title better and didn't waste money, kuddos for themBig Red Machine wrote:I just read that is the same title belt with a paint-job, which is not only dumb, but it will look embarrassing when the paint starts to chip.