This feud has been building for months and the talk is to have King face Michael Cole at WrestleMania. Is this a good or bad idea?

I would rather it be "If Lawler beat Riley, he gets five minutes with Cole" or If Cena beat Miz, Lawler gets five minutes with Cole."

Big Red Machine wrote:I would rather it be "If Lawler beat Riley, he gets five minutes with Cole" or If Cena beat Miz, Lawler gets five minutes with Cole."

Something like this. Just to tie it all together and make it more a "fight" than a "wrestling" (woops that is banned now..) "Sports Entertainment" Match.

Lynas wrote:

Big Red Machine wrote:I would rather it be "If Lawler beat Riley, he gets five minutes with Cole" or If Cena beat Miz, Lawler gets five minutes with Cole."

Something like this. Just to tie it all together and make it more a "fight" than a "wrestling" (woops that is banned now..) "Sports Entertainment" Match.

Not even a fight. It should be an old "manager gets an ass-whooping form the babyface" style thing.

no, not a fight, i rather have them in Cena and Miz' corners during the main event. this match sounds like Bischoff/Long from SS or even Hart/McMahon...

cero2k wrote:no, not a fight, i rather have them in Cena and Miz' corners during the main event. this match sounds like Bischoff/Long from SS or even Hart/McMahon...

Oh god, i had almost completely blocked out Long/Bischoff!!!!!! X_X

Never at WM, or any PPV for that matter. We all know that this would be completely one-sided. We don't need this plaguing a three hour time slot that many people paid upwards of $50 to see. Have it happen as a post-match extra, like BRM suggested.

Big Red Machine wrote:I would rather it be "If Lawler beat Riley, he gets five minutes with Cole" or If Cena beat Miz, Lawler gets five minutes with Cole."

this is a MUCH better idea

I said no, only in a one on one sense. Would liked to of seen a tag match of some kind.

Aggro wrote:I said no, only in a one on one sense. Would liked to of seen a tag match of some kind.

even this.

How bout Cole & Riley v. Lawler & Bryan

Then MITB: Sheamus v. McIntyre v. Kofi v. Morrison v. Ziggler v. Truth

badnewzxl wrote:

Aggro wrote:I said no, only in a one on one sense. Would liked to of seen a tag match of some kind.

even this.

How bout Cole & Riley v. Lawler & Bryan

Then MITB: Sheamus v. McIntyre v. Kofi v. Morrison v. Ziggler v. Truth

That would work, what with the heat Cole had with Bryan on the first series of NXT.

Aggro wrote:

badnewzxl wrote:

Aggro wrote:I said no, only in a one on one sense. Would liked to of seen a tag match of some kind.

even this.

How bout Cole & Riley v. Lawler & Bryan

Then MITB: Sheamus v. McIntyre v. Kofi v. Morrison v. Ziggler v. Truth

That would work, what with the heat Cole had with Bryan on the first series of NXT.

But then WM lacks a US Title match.

Lynas wrote: But then WM lacks a US Title match.

True, although WWE have neglected their secondary titles at Wrestlemania in the past.

Aggro wrote:

Lynas wrote: But then WM lacks a US Title match.

True, although WWE have neglected their secondary titles at Wrestlemania in the past.

This is true... they usually have the IC Champ in the MITB match...

It would work if Bryan dropped the belt to Sheamus before the Event I guess...

But that Tag Match would be something I'd watch, at least there'd be some action with good workers elsewhere to watch.

e-moose wrote:I thought about this and chose "yes" just because I really think that they will keep the match under 10 minutes and come up with a few twists and hilarious moments to keep us entertained.

you have good points here. Plus, with Austin involved now too, it doesn't seem too bad....

badnewzxl wrote: Plus, with Austin involved now too, it doesn't seem too bad....

Austin's involvement will make it worse. He will totally eliminate any drama, because we know that Lawler will come out on top in the end, and there will be no odds for Lawler to overcome.

Big Red Machine wrote:

badnewzxl wrote: Plus, with Austin involved now too, it doesn't seem too bad....

Austin's involvement will make it worse. He will totally eliminate any drama, because we know that Lawler will come out on top in the end, and there will be no odds for Lawler to overcome.

thats why ive been thinking austin needs to turn heel in the match

KILLdozer wrote:thats why ive been thinking austin needs to turn heel in the match

Or the thing that make more sense, they'll have Cole say that it was his choice so JBL is the referee. Turning Austin heel makes no sense because the crowd loves him and he's made two tv appearances in a years time. Either way you slice it, people will be more into what he does over what Lawler & Cole do. WWE failure right there....

Rabid619 wrote:

KILLdozer wrote:thats why ive been thinking austin needs to turn heel in the match

Or the thing that make more sense, they'll have Cole say that it was his choice so JBL is the referee. Turning Austin heel makes no sense because the crowd loves him and he's made two tv appearances in a years time. Either way you slice it, people will be more into what he does over what Lawler & Cole do. WWE failure right there....

This.