Re: Night Of Champions (Live Discussion)
Posted: Sep 18th, '11, 19:58
to bad Sin Cara aint on tonight's show
What was it all about with two Sin Cara's on smackdown last fridayPhreak wrote:to bad Sin Cara aint on tonight's show
http://thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/
http://thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4488
What was it all about with two Sin Cara's on smackdown last fridayPhreak wrote:to bad Sin Cara aint on tonight's show
Up until Friday I figured that was going to be the opponent for Cody Rhodes. WAY too soon to blow off Rhodes and DiBiase, imo. DiBiase should have returned tonight.Phreak wrote:to bad Sin Cara aint on tonight's show
There's an evil imposter!Dead Man Walking wrote:What was it all about with two Sin Cara's on smackdown last fridayPhreak wrote:to bad Sin Cara aint on tonight's show
Bob-O wrote:Up until Friday I figured that was going to be the opponent for Cody Rhodes. WAY too soon to blow off Rhodes and DiBiase, imo. DiBiase should have returned tonight.Phreak wrote:to bad Sin Cara aint on tonight's show
Bob-O wrote:buh buh buh but....
it was his destiny.... :-\
Title reigns don't mean anything anymore. It means you're being considered for an upper tier push. I've blogged about it before, these days the titles are used to put guys over rather than being a status symbol of actually being over.Phreak wrote:so do yall think that the title reigns mean anything now days? Ric flair, Hogan, Savage, Henning and many others worked their a**'s off to win their title's, and yes, Cena has earned his few reigns
but it was a big deal when Flair won his 16 title reigns, but now it seems anyone can be a champ
what do you think
Bob-O wrote:Title reigns don't mean anything anymore. It means you're being considered for an upper tier push. I've blogged about it before, these days the titles are used to put guys over rather than being a status symbol of actually being over.Phreak wrote:so do yall think that the title reigns mean anything now days? Ric flair, Hogan, Savage, Henning and many others worked their a**'s off to win their title's, and yes, Cena has earned his few reigns
but it was a big deal when Flair won his 16 title reigns, but now it seems anyone can be a champ
what do you think
They let someone win the title then at the next ppv. They have them lose it. I rembemer back in 2005 i think it was 2005. Was when JBL held the wwe title for a Year. And I belive that after that. They havent let one anyone have the title very long. That's what i belive
they prolly want the shock value, for if he loses... Vicki mentioned herself earlyer, but Im thinkin Nash will be involved to Help Punk out, which will make Nash or John the COOBob-O wrote:I'm wondering why there's no downside to CM Punk losing. If Triple H loses he's no longer COO. If Punk loses there's no consequence.
I'm also curious as to why they never announced who the new COO would be should Triple H lose. Seems like something they'd want to clear up from the get go...
I don't think so I think they Made tripple H like the Raw gm/ COO But if they pan the announcers table the right way you can see the stand and the computer Cole uses to read emails from the anon raw GM. I think they stopped it. But if that is so. Why do they still have the computer out there still?Phreak wrote:WAIt...they still have the "Anon GM" around ?
Dead Man Walking wrote:I don't think so I think they Made tripple H like the Raw gm/ COO But if they pan the announcers table the right way you can see the stand and the computer Cole uses to read emails from the anon raw GM. I think they stopped it. But if that is so. Why do they still have the computer out there still?Phreak wrote:WAIt...they still have the "Anon GM" around ?