Re: WOTW: Botch
Posted: Jan 26th, '11, 20:59
It just looks nasty. It's actually not that bad if it's done right.Earth Child wrote:But isn't that too risky?
http://thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/
It just looks nasty. It's actually not that bad if it's done right.Earth Child wrote:But isn't that too risky?
yourcrapsweak wrote:It just looks nasty. It's actually not that bad if it's done right.Earth Child wrote:But isn't that too risky?
OMG! Are you referring to that TERRIBLE movie called "Day of the Warrior" or something like that? GOD that was awful; even for a shitty movie!Aggro wrote:yourcrapsweak wrote:It just looks nasty. It's actually not that bad if it's done right.Earth Child wrote:But isn't that too risky?
Just like Buff Bagwell's neck injury. He breaks his neck but soon after is making cheap adult B movies!
badnewzxl wrote:OMG! Are you referring to that TERRIBLE movie called "Day of the Warrior" or something like that? GOD that was awful; even for a shitty movie!Aggro wrote: Just like Buff Bagwell's neck injury. He breaks his neck but soon after is making cheap adult B movies!
OH NO!!!!Aggro wrote:badnewzxl wrote:OMG! Are you referring to that TERRIBLE movie called "Day of the Warrior" or something like that? GOD that was awful; even for a shitty movie!Aggro wrote: Just like Buff Bagwell's neck injury. He breaks his neck but soon after is making cheap adult B movies!
) Thats the one! Ha, I should of remembered that we share a liking of crap movies! There is a sequel too!