Re: TNA Genesis Discussion w/Live Updates
Posted: Jan 8th, '12, 19:03
I like GunnerDead Man Walking wrote:Gunner needs to be beaten with a bat till he cant move
http://thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/
http://thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6085
I like GunnerDead Man Walking wrote:Gunner needs to be beaten with a bat till he cant move
I haven't lost it. Well not yet anywaysRabid619 wrote:I seem to have lost my stream...
In Devon's defense, he hasn't had hair in, like 20 years, so he probably doesn't know much about good haircuts.Rabid619 wrote:What father in their right mind would actually let their own son have a stupid haircut like that.
I thought it was good for TNA; the show actually didn't have any embarassing screw ups, awful production, or god-awful match endings. Hardy v. Roode was pretty good and the finish wasn't very different from the ending of SD!'s main event. The X Div match was VERY entertaining and the Tag title match was a GOOD tag match and not just TNA trying to get Crimson and Morgan more over. I figured you'd have liked the storytelling in the Pope v. Devon match, too; I thought it was pretty good. Gunner v RVD was nothing to write home about, but it stood its ground. The KO's match was basically the same "suspended in a cage above the ring match" we always see in wrestling, but I liked that about it.Big Red Machine wrote:Really? I thought this show was pretty bad, aside from Angle vs. Storm and Bubba vs. Abyss
The ending to Hardy vs Roode was much different than the ending to the SD main event (but that makes sense because the characters involved are very different). The thing that bothers me about this a lot more is that this is a PPV, not free TV. The KO's match wasn't the same as the usual "suspended above the ring in a cage" match because, in the usual version, the cage actually STOPS THE HEEL FROM CHEATING, leading to a resolution of the feud.badnewzxl wrote:I thought it was good for TNA; the show actually didn't have any embarassing screw ups, awful production, or god-awful match endings. Hardy v. Roode was pretty good and the finish wasn't very different from the ending of SD!'s main event. The X Div match was VERY entertaining and the Tag title match was a GOOD tag match and not just TNA trying to get Crimson and Morgan more over. I figured you'd have liked the storytelling in the Pope v. Devon match, too; I thought it was pretty good. Gunner v RVD was nothing to write home about, but it stood its ground. The KO's match was basically the same "suspended in a cage above the ring match" we always see in wrestling, but I liked that about it.Big Red Machine wrote:Really? I thought this show was pretty bad, aside from Angle vs. Storm and Bubba vs. Abyss
What did you think was bad (besides the commentary, of course)?
That's ok After I rabid said he lost the stream I tried to take over but after i realized that no one was even a apart of it I stopped and just watched the ppv. The ending of the World Title Match Was crap. I figured that Rude would have cheated to win to keep the title. But wasn't excpeting Rude to kick the ref in the fucking balls to get DQ to keep the title. I thought that was crap.badnewzxl wrote:DMW (sorry I passed out last night; too many brews) you're dead on! This was the best TNA PPV since 2010. Destination X is it's only competition....
It's sh*t that TNA has to have more then one finish on a PPV to be a disqualification. TNA overbooks too much.Dead Man Walking wrote:The ending of the World Title Match Was crap. I figured that Rude would have cheated to win to keep the title. But wasn't excpeting Rude to kick the ref in the f***ing balls to get DQ to keep the title. I thought that was crap.
when has that stip EVER stopped the heels from cheating? When they did it with Robbie E v. Jay Lethal, Cookie still managed to interfere (in fact, wasn't it the same EXACT ending? Didn't Lethal get DQ'd for using a foreign object?); when Cornette was put in the Straight Jacket, didn't he manage to get loose and throw something down for the Midnight Express? Correct me if I'm wrong.Big Red Machine wrote:The ending to Hardy vs Roode was much different than the ending to the SD main event (but that makes sense because the characters involved are very different). The thing that bothers me about this a lot more is that this is a PPV, not free TV. The KO's match wasn't the same as the usual "suspended above the ring in a cage" match because, in the usual version, the cage actually STOPS THE HEEL FROM CHEATING, leading to a resolution of the feud.badnewzxl wrote:I thought it was good for TNA; the show actually didn't have any embarassing screw ups, awful production, or god-awful match endings. Hardy v. Roode was pretty good and the finish wasn't very different from the ending of SD!'s main event. The X Div match was VERY entertaining and the Tag title match was a GOOD tag match and not just TNA trying to get Crimson and Morgan more over. I figured you'd have liked the storytelling in the Pope v. Devon match, too; I thought it was pretty good. Gunner v RVD was nothing to write home about, but it stood its ground. The KO's match was basically the same "suspended in a cage above the ring match" we always see in wrestling, but I liked that about it.Big Red Machine wrote:Really? I thought this show was pretty bad, aside from Angle vs. Storm and Bubba vs. Abyss
What did you think was bad (besides the commentary, of course)?
The booking in both the KOs match and Pope vs. Devon was bad (it was a great story, but way to early in the feud), the finish to Roode vs. Hardy was bad. RVD vs. Gunner and the Tag Team Title match were competent, but they were a long way from being "good."
Yes, the same thing happened with Robbie E. and Jay Lethal, and yes, the smae thing happened with the Fantastics and the Midnight Express. So if it never works, what is the point of it? If we know it will never work, why do it?badnewzxl wrote:when has that stip EVER stopped the heels from cheating? When they did it with Robbie E v. Jay Lethal, Cookie still managed to interfere (in fact, wasn't it the same EXACT ending? Didn't Lethal get DQ'd for using a foreign object?); when Cornette was put in the Straight Jacket, didn't he manage to get loose and throw something down for the Midnight Express? Correct me if I'm wrong.Big Red Machine wrote:The ending to Hardy vs Roode was much different than the ending to the SD main event (but that makes sense because the characters involved are very different). The thing that bothers me about this a lot more is that this is a PPV, not free TV. The KO's match wasn't the same as the usual "suspended above the ring in a cage" match because, in the usual version, the cage actually STOPS THE HEEL FROM CHEATING, leading to a resolution of the feud.badnewzxl wrote:
I thought it was good for TNA; the show actually didn't have any embarassing screw ups, awful production, or god-awful match endings. Hardy v. Roode was pretty good and the finish wasn't very different from the ending of SD!'s main event. The X Div match was VERY entertaining and the Tag title match was a GOOD tag match and not just TNA trying to get Crimson and Morgan more over. I figured you'd have liked the storytelling in the Pope v. Devon match, too; I thought it was pretty good. Gunner v RVD was nothing to write home about, but it stood its ground. The KO's match was basically the same "suspended in a cage above the ring match" we always see in wrestling, but I liked that about it.
What did you think was bad (besides the commentary, of course)?
The booking in both the KOs match and Pope vs. Devon was bad (it was a great story, but way to early in the feud), the finish to Roode vs. Hardy was bad. RVD vs. Gunner and the Tag Team Title match were competent, but they were a long way from being "good."
I disagree about the turn of the Devon/Pope feud; the boys have been on Pope's side for months. How long do they really have to be AGAINST their father? I think the angle makes a lot more sense: It's one thing to disobey your parents and hangout with folks they disagree with; it's totally another to be pressured into beating your own parents down. I guess I just get it.
And let me reiterate that by 'good' I mean good for TNA over the past two years; it wasn't the usual brick of s**t they trick folks into buying. I actually liked Roode's DQ bc he actually SHOWED desperation and didn't just do something out of the blue (he tried to walk out on the match several times and tried to use the ropes to his advantage; pulled out all the tricks). I think they need to just get rid of Immortal and have Flair manage Roode to clear the line even more....