Page 2 of 2
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jan 20th, '11, 19:31
by badnewzxl
^ For sure. I give Cage matches the edge bc of it's longevity; it's still referred to as the (or at least ONE of the) most dangerous.
Ladder matches are a close second (this is of course barring death matches).
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Mar 29th, '11, 03:22
by Big Bad Booty Daddy
First blood is pretty bad, same reason as BRM said
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 09:44
by Serujuunin
I don't like the idea of the four corners matches... I'm not really sure why, but it seems silly to me that one can win a match just by touching all four corners of the ring.
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 10:00
by yourcrapsweak
Serujuunin wrote:I don't like the idea of the four corners matches... I'm not really sure why, but it seems silly to me that one can win a match just by touching all four corners of the ring.
I sort of agree. It shows a lot of strength and makes it look like you really beat the shit out of the other guy if you drag them around the ring to all four corners.
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 14:59
by womenwrestlerfan
Handicap Matches and Bra & Panties Matches
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 15:56
by yourcrapsweak
womenwrestlerfan wrote:Handicap Matches and Bra & Panties Matches
Disagree with both! Handicap matches I don't understand why you don't like, but bra and panties matches are brilliant =p~
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 16:19
by womenwrestlerfan
yourcrapsweak wrote:womenwrestlerfan wrote:Handicap Matches and Bra & Panties Matches
Disagree with both! Handicap matches I don't understand why you don't like, but bra and panties matches are brilliant =p~
No offense, but you're a pig
I like traditional 1 on 1 matches, not 2 vs. 1, 3 vs. 1, 4 vs. 1, etc.
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 16:37
by yourcrapsweak
womenwrestlerfan wrote:yourcrapsweak wrote:womenwrestlerfan wrote:Handicap Matches and Bra & Panties Matches
Disagree with both! Handicap matches I don't understand why you don't like, but bra and panties matches are brilliant =p~
No offense, but you're a pig
I like traditional 1 on 1 matches, not 2 vs. 1, 3 vs. 1, 4 vs. 1, etc.
That is offensive lol, good thing I'm too chill to care.
Bra & Panties matches are the same as Tuxedo Matches. Do you not like those? Because if you don't have a problem with those, then you're living by a double standard. Those women agree to do those matches, so you cannot blame us for enjoying them. If you worry about them being degraded, they are degrading themselves. If Vince asks them to take their clothes off and they agree, who is really to blame?
But why though?
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 16:51
by Rabid619
yourcrapsweak wrote:
That is offensive lol, good thing I'm too chill to care.
Bra & Panties matches are the same as Tuxedo Matches. Do you not like those? Because if you don't have a problem with those, then you're living by a double standard. Those women agree to do those matches, so you cannot blame us for enjoying them. If you worry about them being degraded, they are degrading themselves. If Vince asks them to take their clothes off and they agree, who is really to blame?
But why though?
All of this! =))
Like YCW said Bra & Panties Matches are as degrading to women as a Tuxedo Match is to men.
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 17:03
by womenwrestlerfan
Everyone has their own likes and dislikes, but I do like any smart would do and that's cut the TV off
But also, Bra & Panties Matches are for other things, not for wrestling
Thank Goodness I'm not like you all and also, you wouldn't understand even if I told ya
If I ran a wrestling company, I wouldn't allow that
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 17:05
by yourcrapsweak
womenwrestlerfan wrote:Everyone has their own likes and dislikes, but I do like any smart would do and that's cut the TV off
But also, Bra & Panties Matches are for other things, not for wrestling
Thank Goodness I'm not like you all and also, you wouldn't understand even if I told ya
If I ran a wrestling company, I wouldn't allow that
I wouldn't say any smart man would do that. And I'm sure we would understand; we'd just disagree.
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 17:09
by womenwrestlerfan
There are other worst gimmick matches that I don't like
Elimination Chamber except for the very 1st one @ Survivor Series 2002 w/the one from New Year's Revolution 2005 being a close 2nd
The rest I didn't care for
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 17:50
by Big Red Machine
yourcrapsweak wrote:
Bra & Panties matches are the same as Tuxedo Matches. Do you not like those? Because if you don't have a problem with those, then you're living by a double standard. Those women agree to do those matches, so you cannot blame us for enjoying them. If you worry about them being degraded, they are degrading themselves. If Vince asks them to take their clothes off and they agree, who is really to blame?
I HAVE A DISCIPLE!
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 19:39
by Serujuunin
Big Red Machine wrote:yourcrapsweak wrote:
Bra & Panties matches are the same as Tuxedo Matches. Do you not like those? Because if you don't have a problem with those, then you're living by a double standard. Those women agree to do those matches, so you cannot blame us for enjoying them. If you worry about them being degraded, they are degrading themselves. If Vince asks them to take their clothes off and they agree, who is really to blame?
I HAVE A DISCIPLE!
I have to agree. Also, being a woman, my perspective is a little different. To all those women that think they're bein degraded by being "made" to dress like that, don't you realize that by showing off the right parts of your body you can make men eat out of the palms of your hands? How is that degrading? That's almost EMPOWERING. And you can always say no... Just my opinion though.
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 20:08
by yourcrapsweak
womenwrestlerfan wrote:There are other worst gimmick matches that I don't like
Elimination Chamber except for the very 1st one @ Survivor Series 2002 w/the one from New Year's Revolution 2005 being a close 2nd
The rest I didn't care for
Wait, do you have a legit reason to dislike the gimmick, or did you just not enjoy the matches? We're talking about silly stipulations, not bad matches.
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 20:22
by womenwrestlerfan
yourcrapsweak wrote:Wait, do you have a legit reason to dislike the gimmick, or did you just not enjoy the matches? We're talking about silly stipulations, not bad matches.
You don't want to know
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 20:27
by cero2k
womenwrestlerfan wrote:yourcrapsweak wrote:Wait, do you have a legit reason to dislike the gimmick, or did you just not enjoy the matches? We're talking about silly stipulations, not bad matches.
You don't want to know
I kinda do...
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 20:31
by Big Red Machine
womenwrestlerfan wrote:yourcrapsweak wrote:Wait, do you have a legit reason to dislike the gimmick, or did you just not enjoy the matches? We're talking about silly stipulations, not bad matches.
You don't want to know
He wouldn't have asked unless he did.
Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match
Posted: Jun 5th, '11, 22:38
by yourcrapsweak
womenwrestlerfan wrote:yourcrapsweak wrote:Wait, do you have a legit reason to dislike the gimmick, or did you just not enjoy the matches? We're talking about silly stipulations, not bad matches.
You don't want to know
Uh, yeah I do? Lol.