WOTW: Gimmick Match

All Time Greatest, Worst, Sickest, Weirdest, Funniest...you get the idea.
badnewzxl
Posts: 2918
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:53

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by badnewzxl » Jan 20th, '11, 19:31

^ For sure. I give Cage matches the edge bc of it's longevity; it's still referred to as the (or at least ONE of the) most dangerous.

Ladder matches are a close second (this is of course barring death matches).
Image

User avatar
Big Bad Booty Daddy
Posts: 669
Joined: Dec 21st, '10, 10:07

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Big Bad Booty Daddy » Mar 29th, '11, 03:22

First blood is pretty bad, same reason as BRM said
Image

User avatar
Serujuunin
Posts: 2441
Joined: Dec 17th, '10, 19:56

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Serujuunin » Jun 5th, '11, 09:44

I don't like the idea of the four corners matches... I'm not really sure why, but it seems silly to me that one can win a match just by touching all four corners of the ring.

User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by yourcrapsweak » Jun 5th, '11, 10:00

Serujuunin wrote:I don't like the idea of the four corners matches... I'm not really sure why, but it seems silly to me that one can win a match just by touching all four corners of the ring.
I sort of agree. It shows a lot of strength and makes it look like you really beat the shit out of the other guy if you drag them around the ring to all four corners.
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

User avatar
womenwrestlerfan
Future Endeavored
Posts: 317
Joined: Dec 18th, '10, 18:28

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by womenwrestlerfan » Jun 5th, '11, 14:59

Handicap Matches and Bra & Panties Matches

User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by yourcrapsweak » Jun 5th, '11, 15:56

womenwrestlerfan wrote:Handicap Matches and Bra & Panties Matches
Disagree with both! Handicap matches I don't understand why you don't like, but bra and panties matches are brilliant =p~
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

User avatar
womenwrestlerfan
Future Endeavored
Posts: 317
Joined: Dec 18th, '10, 18:28

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by womenwrestlerfan » Jun 5th, '11, 16:19

yourcrapsweak wrote:
womenwrestlerfan wrote:Handicap Matches and Bra & Panties Matches
Disagree with both! Handicap matches I don't understand why you don't like, but bra and panties matches are brilliant =p~
No offense, but you're a pig

I like traditional 1 on 1 matches, not 2 vs. 1, 3 vs. 1, 4 vs. 1, etc.

User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by yourcrapsweak » Jun 5th, '11, 16:37

womenwrestlerfan wrote:
yourcrapsweak wrote:
womenwrestlerfan wrote:Handicap Matches and Bra & Panties Matches
Disagree with both! Handicap matches I don't understand why you don't like, but bra and panties matches are brilliant =p~
No offense, but you're a pig

I like traditional 1 on 1 matches, not 2 vs. 1, 3 vs. 1, 4 vs. 1, etc.
That is offensive lol, good thing I'm too chill to care.

Bra & Panties matches are the same as Tuxedo Matches. Do you not like those? Because if you don't have a problem with those, then you're living by a double standard. Those women agree to do those matches, so you cannot blame us for enjoying them. If you worry about them being degraded, they are degrading themselves. If Vince asks them to take their clothes off and they agree, who is really to blame?

But why though?
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

User avatar
Rabid619
Posts: 6093
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 14:02

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Rabid619 » Jun 5th, '11, 16:51

yourcrapsweak wrote: That is offensive lol, good thing I'm too chill to care.

Bra & Panties matches are the same as Tuxedo Matches. Do you not like those? Because if you don't have a problem with those, then you're living by a double standard. Those women agree to do those matches, so you cannot blame us for enjoying them. If you worry about them being degraded, they are degrading themselves. If Vince asks them to take their clothes off and they agree, who is really to blame?

But why though?
All of this! =))

Like YCW said Bra & Panties Matches are as degrading to women as a Tuxedo Match is to men.
Image

User avatar
womenwrestlerfan
Future Endeavored
Posts: 317
Joined: Dec 18th, '10, 18:28

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by womenwrestlerfan » Jun 5th, '11, 17:03

Everyone has their own likes and dislikes, but I do like any smart would do and that's cut the TV off

But also, Bra & Panties Matches are for other things, not for wrestling

Thank Goodness I'm not like you all and also, you wouldn't understand even if I told ya

If I ran a wrestling company, I wouldn't allow that

User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by yourcrapsweak » Jun 5th, '11, 17:05

womenwrestlerfan wrote:Everyone has their own likes and dislikes, but I do like any smart would do and that's cut the TV off

But also, Bra & Panties Matches are for other things, not for wrestling

Thank Goodness I'm not like you all and also, you wouldn't understand even if I told ya

If I ran a wrestling company, I wouldn't allow that
I wouldn't say any smart man would do that. And I'm sure we would understand; we'd just disagree.
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

User avatar
womenwrestlerfan
Future Endeavored
Posts: 317
Joined: Dec 18th, '10, 18:28

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by womenwrestlerfan » Jun 5th, '11, 17:09

There are other worst gimmick matches that I don't like

Elimination Chamber except for the very 1st one @ Survivor Series 2002 w/the one from New Year's Revolution 2005 being a close 2nd

The rest I didn't care for

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Big Red Machine » Jun 5th, '11, 17:50

yourcrapsweak wrote:
Bra & Panties matches are the same as Tuxedo Matches. Do you not like those? Because if you don't have a problem with those, then you're living by a double standard. Those women agree to do those matches, so you cannot blame us for enjoying them. If you worry about them being degraded, they are degrading themselves. If Vince asks them to take their clothes off and they agree, who is really to blame?
I HAVE A DISCIPLE!
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

User avatar
Serujuunin
Posts: 2441
Joined: Dec 17th, '10, 19:56

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Serujuunin » Jun 5th, '11, 19:39

Big Red Machine wrote:
yourcrapsweak wrote:
Bra & Panties matches are the same as Tuxedo Matches. Do you not like those? Because if you don't have a problem with those, then you're living by a double standard. Those women agree to do those matches, so you cannot blame us for enjoying them. If you worry about them being degraded, they are degrading themselves. If Vince asks them to take their clothes off and they agree, who is really to blame?
I HAVE A DISCIPLE!
I have to agree. Also, being a woman, my perspective is a little different. To all those women that think they're bein degraded by being "made" to dress like that, don't you realize that by showing off the right parts of your body you can make men eat out of the palms of your hands? How is that degrading? That's almost EMPOWERING. And you can always say no... Just my opinion though.

User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by yourcrapsweak » Jun 5th, '11, 20:08

womenwrestlerfan wrote:There are other worst gimmick matches that I don't like

Elimination Chamber except for the very 1st one @ Survivor Series 2002 w/the one from New Year's Revolution 2005 being a close 2nd

The rest I didn't care for
Wait, do you have a legit reason to dislike the gimmick, or did you just not enjoy the matches? We're talking about silly stipulations, not bad matches.
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

User avatar
womenwrestlerfan
Future Endeavored
Posts: 317
Joined: Dec 18th, '10, 18:28

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by womenwrestlerfan » Jun 5th, '11, 20:22

yourcrapsweak wrote:Wait, do you have a legit reason to dislike the gimmick, or did you just not enjoy the matches? We're talking about silly stipulations, not bad matches.
You don't want to know

User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by cero2k » Jun 5th, '11, 20:27

womenwrestlerfan wrote:
yourcrapsweak wrote:Wait, do you have a legit reason to dislike the gimmick, or did you just not enjoy the matches? We're talking about silly stipulations, not bad matches.
You don't want to know
I kinda do...
Image

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Big Red Machine » Jun 5th, '11, 20:31

womenwrestlerfan wrote:
yourcrapsweak wrote:Wait, do you have a legit reason to dislike the gimmick, or did you just not enjoy the matches? We're talking about silly stipulations, not bad matches.
You don't want to know
He wouldn't have asked unless he did.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by yourcrapsweak » Jun 5th, '11, 22:38

womenwrestlerfan wrote:
yourcrapsweak wrote:Wait, do you have a legit reason to dislike the gimmick, or did you just not enjoy the matches? We're talking about silly stipulations, not bad matches.
You don't want to know
Uh, yeah I do? Lol.
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests