Page 6 of 6

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 26th, '11, 20:48
by Rabid619
KILLdozer wrote:there was a news article advertising a lawsuit coming with wwe stars v the wwe or monday night raw a ways back,,noone knew what it meant..there it is
How long ago was that?

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 26th, '11, 20:50
by Rabid619
Punk and Del Rio fighting outside the ring. Punk tosses Del Rio in Cena's general direction and Booker called it right. It was a brush back because he aimed for Del Rio to brush by Cena.

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 26th, '11, 20:50
by Dead Man Walking
KILLdozer wrote:
Rabid619 wrote:
KILLdozer wrote:i agree,i like it alot..and THAT is WWE RAW V WWE! remember the article?
Wait what?
there was a news article advertising a lawsuit coming with wwe stars v the wwe or monday night raw a ways back,,noone knew what it meant..there it is
We still have no clue what your talking about

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 26th, '11, 20:52
by KILLdozer

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 26th, '11, 20:53
by cero2k
Dead Man Walking wrote:
KILLdozer wrote:
there was a news article advertising a lawsuit coming with wwe stars v the wwe or monday night raw a ways back,,noone knew what it meant..there it is
We still have no clue what your talking about
WWE advertised a RAW vs WWE show a long time ago for fall. Dozer is saying that the group we just saw with Otunga could be that group that represents either WWE or RAW. There has also been a lot of talk of a SS match between WWE face people defending against the "Future Endevored" guys, which could have something to do with this group

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 26th, '11, 20:57
by Rabid619
cero2k wrote:WWE advertised a RAW vs WWE show a long time ago for fall. Dozer is saying that the group we just saw with Otunga could be that group that represents either WWE or RAW. There has also been a lot of talk of a SS match between WWE face people defending against the "Future Endevored" guys, which could have something to do with this group
Oh i remember that now. I'm a bit slow on the uptake for some reason tonight.

Good match so far.

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 26th, '11, 20:58
by Dead Man Walking
Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause: Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause: Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause: Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause: Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause: Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause: Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause: Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause: Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause: Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause: Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause: Here we go Punk. Here we go :ymapplause: :ymapplause:

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 26th, '11, 21:01
by cero2k
:-w

He honestly won with just a kick!?

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 26th, '11, 21:01
by Rabid619
Punk wins and the cell is lowered down to the ring. Cena keeps Ricardo within the right spot so he's locked in with Punk & Cena. GTS to Ricardo followed by an AA. Punk tries a GTS on Cena then Cena tries an AA but Del Rio comes in and uses a chair on Punk & Cena.

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 26th, '11, 21:02
by Dead Man Walking
cero2k wrote::-w

He honestly won with just a kick!?
Yeah he did

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 26th, '11, 21:02
by Rabid619
Dead Man Walking wrote:Yeah he did
Cero's mad that Punk won with just a kick and not his finisher. I am as well.... :-w

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 27th, '11, 13:13
by KILLdozer
so whats hhh gonna do about jackman? i agreed with zigler,,if hes doing all this cracking down on guys assaulting refs and announers,,why wouldnt he crak down on someone not employed by the company assaulting a superstar for no reason? Zigler never touched or provoked him during the match,vickie slapped ryder,that was it. ziggler has a point if you ask me ,bias from the coo huh hhh? :-w

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 27th, '11, 17:44
by kiel297
KILLdozer wrote:so whats hhh gonna do about jackman? i agreed with zigler,,if hes doing all this cracking down on guys assaulting refs and announers,,why wouldnt he crak down on someone not employed by the company assaulting a superstar for no reason? Zigler never touched or provoked him during the match,vickie slapped ryder,that was it. ziggler has a point if you ask me ,bias from the coo huh hhh? :-w
Because faces and heels.

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 27th, '11, 18:39
by KILLdozer
kiel297 wrote:
KILLdozer wrote:so whats hhh gonna do about jackman? i agreed with zigler,,if hes doing all this cracking down on guys assaulting refs and announers,,why wouldnt he crak down on someone not employed by the company assaulting a superstar for no reason? Zigler never touched or provoked him during the match,vickie slapped ryder,that was it. ziggler has a point if you ask me ,bias from the coo huh hhh? :-w
Because faces and heels.
yea? cuz thats the point i was making,i dont think in the position hes in he should be favoring faces over heels,he should just be the unbiased tough no nonsense from ANYBODY type of boss

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 27th, '11, 19:45
by Rabid619
KILLdozer wrote:yea? cuz thats the point i was making,i dont think in the position hes in he should be favoring faces over heels,he should just be the unbiased tough no nonsense from ANYBODY type of boss
He's a face authority figure right now. Of course he's going to cater to the crowd and against heels. Take Bischoff as the RAW GM, he RARELY did anything that was fair for a face. He always made it easy on heels. Trips is a face, YES he should be unbiased because he's the COO but Vince did the same thing.

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 27th, '11, 19:46
by KILLdozer
Rabid619 wrote:
KILLdozer wrote:yea? cuz thats the point i was making,i dont think in the position hes in he should be favoring faces over heels,he should just be the unbiased tough no nonsense from ANYBODY type of boss
He's a face authority figure right now. Of course he's going to cater to the crowd and against heels. Take Bischoff as the RAW GM, he RARELY did anything that was fair for a face. He always made it easy on heels. Trips is a face, YES he should be unbiased because he's the COO but Vince did the same thing.
but Vince didnt come out making a point about how he was going to handle all the problems and ANYONE that got out of line,with vince you knew he was going to screw you

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 27th, '11, 20:23
by Rabid619
KILLdozer wrote:but Vince didnt come out making a point about how he was going to handle all the problems and ANYONE that got out of line,with vince you knew he was going to screw you
When Vince was a face and in charge, he stacked the deck against the heels and same to the faces when he was a heel. Who really thought Triple H wasn't going to be unbiased? He tries to play to the crowd too much....

Re: RAW Discussion 9/26

Posted: Sep 27th, '11, 20:25
by KILLdozer
Rabid619 wrote:
KILLdozer wrote:but Vince didnt come out making a point about how he was going to handle all the problems and ANYONE that got out of line,with vince you knew he was going to screw you
When Vince was a face and in charge, he stacked the deck against the heels and same to the faces when he was a heel. Who really thought Triple H wasn't going to be unbiased? He tries to play to the crowd too much....
yea,i guess i just think that Ziggler really had a good point against HHH and he just laughed it off with more of his humour,yea every time he talks to a heel we get funny looks and jokes,,as Truth put it :"ah now its funny again"