BRM Reviews NXT Takeover: Chicago II (AWESOME!)

Post Reply
User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 20631
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12
Favorite Wrestler: Kane

BRM Reviews NXT Takeover: Chicago II (AWESOME!)

Post by Big Red Machine » Jun 17th, '18, 14:56

NXT Takeover: Chicago II (6/16/2018)- Chicago, IL

NXT TAG TEAM TITLE MATCH: Undisputed Era(c) (w/Adam Cole) vs. Danny Burch & Oney Lorcan- 8.75/10
STRONG STYLE! Burch and Lorcan have gelled so well as a team that it wasn’t until they started going for double-team moves that it occurred to me that I wasn’t even sure if they had any signature double-team moves. These guys built things up well throughout, had one or two pretty creative spots, and just BEAT THE SH*T OUT OF EACH OTHER. The match was extremely exciting, and holy sh*t can that Oney Lorcan fly. I was shocked at the air he was getting under his own power, and that bump he took from the top rope down to the apron made such a crazy thud I was shocked he was able to get back up. Undisputed Era retained the belts, but Lorcan & Burch got a huge ovation afterwards. The best thing I can compare it to was the ovation Becky Lynch got in a similar spot a few years ago at Takeover: Unstoppable.

THE VELVETEEN DREAM vs. RICOCHET- 8.5/10
TVD had Hulk Hogan-inspired entrance gear. I’m sure people will read too much into that.
This match was a clash of personalities, told almost exclusively through the moves rather than by shouting at each other during the match (although TVD certainly did his fair share of that as well. TVD particularly impressed me with his body language. He did a wonderful job of letting his frustration show in everything he did. Both of these guy impressed with their athleticism, culminating in a finishing sequence that has to be seen to be believed.

NXT WOMEN’S TITLE MATCH: Shayna Baszler(c) vs. Nikki Cross- 6.25/10
Nigel said “they certainly broke the mold when they made Nikki Cross… and then they shut down the factory.” I thought that was a great line.
They did a good job with the personality stuff, but after the first few minutes they really didn’t do much with that story. Cross worked over Baszler’s upper back, neck, and head, but the match was pretty underwhelming.

KEITH LEE is seated at ringside!

NXT TITLE MATCH: Aleister Black(c) vs. Lars Sullivan- 8/10
This was one heck of a slugfest built around the Black Mass. Lars blocked it a few times and also tried to take out Black’s knee before finally being put down by two in a row (after he even kicked out of one). They did a good job of making everything matter, and making every move feel like haymaker.

STREET FIGHT: Tommaso Ciampa vs. Johnny Gargano- 9/10
Gargano came out to the ring with a broken crutch already in hand, starting this match off the way their previous one finished. Ciampa came out with a non-broke crutch, giving him a major reach advantage. The match was as violent as you would expect and they certainly brought the hatred, but it didn’t play into the motifs of the feud as well as their previous match did. They sold their respective body parts (neck for Gargano, knee for Ciampa) very well and the crowd was extremely hot. They took their big crazy bumps and had a lot of cool little ideas and did an excellent job of setting up pieces that would come into play later. Just about the only thing I didn’t like was the “Johnny, use my sign” ECW reference spot. It was just too cutesy for a blood feud.
The wedding ring spot and Gargano snapping at the end are obviously setting a new chapter for this story. I understand why they want to go there and why they thought this required Ciampa winning, and doing so in the exact manner he did, but, to me, if Ciampa is being wheeled away on a stretcher, shouldn’t that mean that he has been judged unable to continue and thus Gargano is the winner? I’m not going to say that it would have worked better if they had had Gargano be declared the winner via Ciampa being unable to continue and then had him still attack Ciampa because while that does work for some routes they could take this, it doesn’t work for all of them, but the finish they did also doesn’t quite sit right with me. If eight officials are telling you not to stop attacking someone during a Street Fight, then that has to mean the match is being ended out of concern for the other guy’s safety, right?


Yet another freakin’ excellent show from NXT… and this was a show were names like Adam Cole, Pete Dunne, Kairi Sane, War Machine, and Kassius Ohno didn’t even wrestle. Now add Keith Lee, Toni Storm, Io Shirai to the list, and it’s truly scary how great NXT is. I wouldn’t even mind seeing them expand Takeovers to three hours just to get some more of that talent into featured roles.


Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
WWE in 2005
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
Beyond Flesh
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
ECW Guilty As Charged 1999

User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 16356
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32
Favorite Wrestler: Eddie Guerrero
Location: El Paso, TX
Contact:

Re: BRM Reviews NXT Takeover: Chicago II (AWESOME!)

Post by cero2k » Jun 18th, '18, 13:47

Big Red Machine wrote:
Jun 17th, '18, 14:56


STREET FIGHT: Tommaso Ciampa vs. Johnny Gargano- 9/10
Gargano came out to the ring with a broken crutch already in hand, starting this match off the way their previous one finished. Ciampa came out with a non-broke crutch, giving him a major reach advantage. The match was as violent as you would expect and they certainly brought the hatred, but it didn’t play into the motifs of the feud as well as their previous match did. They sold their respective body parts (neck for Gargano, knee for Ciampa) very well and the crowd was extremely hot. They took their big crazy bumps and had a lot of cool little ideas and did an excellent job of setting up pieces that would come into play later. Just about the only thing I didn’t like was the “Johnny, use my sign” ECW reference spot. It was just too cutesy for a blood feud.
The wedding ring spot and Gargano snapping at the end are obviously setting a new chapter for this story. I understand why they want to go there and why they thought this required Ciampa winning, and doing so in the exact manner he did, but, to me, if Ciampa is being wheeled away on a stretcher, shouldn’t that mean that he has been judged unable to continue and thus Gargano is the winner? I’m not going to say that it would have worked better if they had had Gargano be declared the winner via Ciampa being unable to continue and then had him still attack Ciampa because while that does work for some routes they could take this, it doesn’t work for all of them, but the finish they did also doesn’t quite sit right with me. If eight officials are telling you not to stop attacking someone during a Street Fight, then that has to mean the match is being ended out of concern for the other guy’s safety, right?
I got a really weird sense that the finish of this match could lead to copying what Edwards and Callihan are doing on Impact with Gargano not getting the win over Ciampa over the obsession of getting his 'payback' and slowly going crazy over not getting the payback and leading into Candice finally not supporting 'psycho' gargano. There are a lot of similarities between the two stories.

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 20631
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12
Favorite Wrestler: Kane

Re: BRM Reviews NXT Takeover: Chicago II (AWESOME!)

Post by Big Red Machine » Jun 18th, '18, 20:34

cero2k wrote:
Jun 18th, '18, 13:47
Big Red Machine wrote:
Jun 17th, '18, 14:56


STREET FIGHT: Tommaso Ciampa vs. Johnny Gargano- 9/10
Gargano came out to the ring with a broken crutch already in hand, starting this match off the way their previous one finished. Ciampa came out with a non-broke crutch, giving him a major reach advantage. The match was as violent as you would expect and they certainly brought the hatred, but it didn’t play into the motifs of the feud as well as their previous match did. They sold their respective body parts (neck for Gargano, knee for Ciampa) very well and the crowd was extremely hot. They took their big crazy bumps and had a lot of cool little ideas and did an excellent job of setting up pieces that would come into play later. Just about the only thing I didn’t like was the “Johnny, use my sign” ECW reference spot. It was just too cutesy for a blood feud.
The wedding ring spot and Gargano snapping at the end are obviously setting a new chapter for this story. I understand why they want to go there and why they thought this required Ciampa winning, and doing so in the exact manner he did, but, to me, if Ciampa is being wheeled away on a stretcher, shouldn’t that mean that he has been judged unable to continue and thus Gargano is the winner? I’m not going to say that it would have worked better if they had had Gargano be declared the winner via Ciampa being unable to continue and then had him still attack Ciampa because while that does work for some routes they could take this, it doesn’t work for all of them, but the finish they did also doesn’t quite sit right with me. If eight officials are telling you not to stop attacking someone during a Street Fight, then that has to mean the match is being ended out of concern for the other guy’s safety, right?
I got a really weird sense that the finish of this match could lead to copying what Edwards and Callihan are doing on Impact with Gargano not getting the win over Ciampa over the obsession of getting his 'payback' and slowly going crazy over not getting the payback and leading into Candice finally not supporting 'psycho' gargano. There are a lot of similarities between the two stories.
It's possible, but I think Hunter pays a lot more attention to this stuff than he'd ever admit and thus he'd make sure that his story isn't the same as TNA's. He wants to be seen as doing his own great thing, not copying anything of someone else's.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
WWE in 2005
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
Beyond Flesh
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
ECW Guilty As Charged 1999

User avatar
KILLdozer
Posts: 4186
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 22:54
Favorite Wrestler: Idk
Location: Ocean Springs,MS.

Re: BRM Reviews NXT Takeover: Chicago II (AWESOME!)

Post by KILLdozer » Jun 19th, '18, 04:50

Who knew Triple H was so smart? Lol.
When they come, they'll come at what you love.

User avatar
Bob-O
Posts: 2284
Joined: Dec 17th, '10, 06:06
Favorite Wrestler: King Kong Bundy
Location: Erie, Pa

Re: BRM Reviews NXT Takeover: Chicago II (AWESOME!)

Post by Bob-O » Jun 19th, '18, 07:09

Big Red Machine wrote:
Jun 18th, '18, 20:34
It's possible, but I think Hunter pays a lot more attention to this stuff than he'd ever admit and thus he'd make sure that his story isn't the same as TNA's. He wants to be seen as doing his own great thing, not copying anything of someone else's.
He strikes me as a "I don't really watch it..." kind of guy. I think if he was fed the idea and he liked it he'd go with it...

I think people might pay for it later if he's called out as a copycat, but I don't think he pays ENOUGH attention to other promotions to know if he's duplicating story lines. If a writer likes what Callahan/Edwards are doing and decides to pitch an idea "INSPIRED" by that, I don't think he's going to know the better unless he's attacked on Twitter. He's just got a much better filter than Vince does.
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest